1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.30.672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended x-ray-absorption fine-structure study of Ag particles isolated in solid argon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is contracted by 0.009 A Ê (0.2%) with respect to the bulk value (4.0862 A Ê ); this is a wellknown effect for small clusters due to the surface stress on the particle (Mays et al, 1968). If we consider the bulk compressibility for silver, 9X6 Â 10 À13 cm 2 dyn À1 , and the surface stress value, f 2286 dyn cm À1 , derived in a previous EXAFS investigation on small Ag clusters (Montano et al, 1984), the expected contraction of the lattice parameter is 0.0092 A Ê , which is in good agreement within the quoted error bars of the experimental observation. This also shows the complementarity of the technique with EXAFS, permitting, in the case of nanometre-sized clusters, a better determination of the lattice parameter by roughly a factor of nine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This value is contracted by 0.009 A Ê (0.2%) with respect to the bulk value (4.0862 A Ê ); this is a wellknown effect for small clusters due to the surface stress on the particle (Mays et al, 1968). If we consider the bulk compressibility for silver, 9X6 Â 10 À13 cm 2 dyn À1 , and the surface stress value, f 2286 dyn cm À1 , derived in a previous EXAFS investigation on small Ag clusters (Montano et al, 1984), the expected contraction of the lattice parameter is 0.0092 A Ê , which is in good agreement within the quoted error bars of the experimental observation. This also shows the complementarity of the technique with EXAFS, permitting, in the case of nanometre-sized clusters, a better determination of the lattice parameter by roughly a factor of nine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Another group of investigations proposed a contrary opinion about the size effect of nanoparticle surface energy density. With the help of the Young-Laplace equation [18], surface energy densities of Ag and Pd nanoparticles were deduced based on the experimental data of lattice parameters [19][20][21], where the surface energy density of nanoparticles was found much larger than those of the bulk materials. Nanda et al [22,23] studied further the surface energy density of Ag nanoparticles using experimental data related to the evaporation temperature, in which a surface energy density 7.2J/m 2 was reported, close to 6.4J/m 2 deduced from lattice contraction experiments [19], but much larger than the bulk one 1.2-1.4J/m 2 [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetization of 16-nm La 0.7 Sr 0.3 MnO 3 nanoparticles is significantly lower than that of a bulk sample [153]. Using extended XAFS, Montano et al [154] measured the nearest-neighbor distance for silver particles of 2.5e13 nm sizes isolated in solid argon and found a noticeable contraction of the nearest-neighbor atomic distance. Lamber et al [155] have measured the lattice contraction of Pd particles of 1.4e5.0 nm sizes using LEED.…”
Section: Observations and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%