2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins after hospital discharge in high-risk surgical and medical patients: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
40
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…121 Extended-duration prophylaxis with LMWH can reduce relative VTE risk by ~60%; however, there has often been concern that their subcutaneous administration could potentially reduce patients' overall satisfaction and adherence to treatment, and hence their ability to prevent VTE effectively. 75,76,122,123 Recent data suggests injection of treatment is not a barrier to patient compliance, particularly for injectable anticoagulants that are only administered once daily compared to multiple times a day. 124,125 Novel oral agents (NOA) on the other hand are convenient to administer and study data suggest they are at least as effective as LMWH against VTE, and in some cases up to 30% to 60% more effective.…”
Section: Anticoagulant Safety and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…121 Extended-duration prophylaxis with LMWH can reduce relative VTE risk by ~60%; however, there has often been concern that their subcutaneous administration could potentially reduce patients' overall satisfaction and adherence to treatment, and hence their ability to prevent VTE effectively. 75,76,122,123 Recent data suggests injection of treatment is not a barrier to patient compliance, particularly for injectable anticoagulants that are only administered once daily compared to multiple times a day. 124,125 Novel oral agents (NOA) on the other hand are convenient to administer and study data suggest they are at least as effective as LMWH against VTE, and in some cases up to 30% to 60% more effective.…”
Section: Anticoagulant Safety and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, extending thromboprophylaxis beyond the first fourteen days after surgery can reduce relative VTE risk by approximately 50% to 70%, compared to employing thromboprophylaxis for fourteen days or less. 51,68,[75][76][77][78]93 …”
Section: Other Influencing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previously published article showed that 34.6 % of patients with PE and 29.3 % of patients with DVT after colorectal surgery will be diagnosed after discharge [1]. Extension of VTE prophylaxis to the post-discharge period in high-risk patients has been suggested in previous studies as well as in American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines [1,[12][13][14][15]. A previously published article showed a reverse correlation between scores on DVT prophylaxis process measures and the identification of VTE [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Furthermore, although analyses specific to abdominopelvic surgery are lacking, a review examining the cost-effectiveness of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis compared with standard-duration thromboprophylaxis among orthopedic patients notes prolonged thromboprophylaxis to be cost-effective with increased pharmacy costs being offset by reductions in venous thromboembolism and the associated costs of hospitalization. 17 Collectively, these data have prompted generalizations regarding the duration of thromboprophylaxis among all patients undergoing surgery for malignancy; however, until now, there have been insufficient data with regard to the true incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism among patients undergoing laparoscopy for gynecologic malignancy. Furthermore, although our study was not established to determine the efficacy of various forms of thromboprophylaxis, the low postoperative incidence of venous thromboembolism in both cancer and noncancer populations suggests the use of intermittent pneumatic compression along with early ambulation is sufficient in preventing clinically overt venous thromboembolism among patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery of at least low or intermediate complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%