SUMMARY
Hypersomnolence plays an important role in the presentation, treatment, and course of mood disorders. However, there has been relatively little research that examines objective measures of sleep duration and continuity in patients with depression and hypersomnolence, despite the use of these factors in sleep medicine nosological systems. This study compared total sleep time and efficiency measured by naturalistic actigraphic recordings followed by ad libitum polysomnography (without prescribed wake time) in twenty-two patients with major depressive disorder and co-occurring hypersomnolence (MDD-HYP) against age- and sex-matched healthy sleeper controls (HC). MDD-HYP demonstrated significantly longer sleep duration compared to HC quantified by sleep diaries, actigraphy, and ad libitum polysomnography. No between-group differences in sleep efficiency, latency to sleep, or wake after sleep onset were observed when assessed using objective measures. To further contextualize these findings within the broader scientific literature, a systematic review was performed to identify other comparable investigations. Meta-analysis of pooled data demonstrated patients with mood disorders and co-occurring hypersomnolence have significantly greater sleep duration and similar sleep efficiency compared to healthy controls when assessed using ad libitum polysomnography. These results suggest current sleep medicine nosology that distinguishes hypersomnia associated with psychiatric disorders primarily as a construct characterized by low sleep efficiency and increased time in bed may not be accurate. Future studies that establish the biological bases hypersomnolence in mood disorders, as well as clarify the accuracy of nosological thresholds to define excessive sleep duration, are needed to refine the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.