1987
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(87)90736-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended shell model calculation of the T=0 natural parity spectrum of 4He

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplicity of our basis allowed us to include excitations of up to 6Ohw. much higher than similar (unconverged) shell-model calculations using an unrestricted basis [4,5], and we thus obtained significantly better ground-state energies. It was found that very large bases are in fact required, with convergence only being achieved for these two potentials at roughly the 40hw and 20hw level, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 40%
“…The simplicity of our basis allowed us to include excitations of up to 6Ohw. much higher than similar (unconverged) shell-model calculations using an unrestricted basis [4,5], and we thus obtained significantly better ground-state energies. It was found that very large bases are in fact required, with convergence only being achieved for these two potentials at roughly the 40hw and 20hw level, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 40%
“…For instance, the beta decay rate of tritium [3] is about 8% less than predicted by this model. Less directly, it has been shown that calculations of the binding energy of He require inclusion of excitations up to 10%co in order to reproduce the measured binding [11], and comparable excitations would be expected in A =3 nuclei as well. It has also been shown [12] that in Faddeev calculations of the binding energy of H up to 34 channels are required in order to achieve convergence.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, at nmaz = 29, which corresp.onds to 581i.w excitation, the first method requires the computation of 30X30 matrix elements, whereas the QT ICC requires the calculation of 465 X 465 matrix elements. In any case, these numbers are still very much smaller than the dimensions corresponding to a full configuration interaction calculation [23]in the complete nmo.znw space.…”
Section: Value (Ii!ticcihiii!ticc)/(ii!ticclii!ticc)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The disadvantage of this approach is that many of the states which result after the diagonalization of the hamiItonian matrix are not physical, because they correspond to excitations of the centre-of-mass. Moreover, the dimension of the space grows very rapidly with Nmax [16,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%