2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.0235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended robust Kalman filter for attitude estimation

Abstract: In this study, the authors deal with inertial measurement units subject to uncertainties. They propose an extended robust Kalman filter (ERKF) in a predictor-corrector form to estimate a rigid body attitude. The filter is developed based on regularisation and penalisation whose approaches present the advantage of encompassing in a unified framework all state and output uncertain parameters of the system. The ERKF is tuned based on two degree of freedom which belong to a certain interval known a-priori, useful … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a disturbance observer, as proposed in Kong et al ( 2009 ), could compensate the effect of human torque τ h in Equations (14) and (20). Optimal robust filter for DMJLS (Ishihara et al, 2015 ) and extended robust Kalman filter proposed in Inoue et al ( 2016 ) could better estimate the states of the SRPAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a disturbance observer, as proposed in Kong et al ( 2009 ), could compensate the effect of human torque τ h in Equations (14) and (20). Optimal robust filter for DMJLS (Ishihara et al, 2015 ) and extended robust Kalman filter proposed in Inoue et al ( 2016 ) could better estimate the states of the SRPAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the model and output equation, the KF can estimate the state, represented by . In Algorithm 1 the discrete local KF is presented with following matrices [ 21 , 22 ]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section, the robust control approaches we are proposing is given in terms of discrete‐time systems. In this sense, can be discretized according to , in the following way xi+1=false(Fi+δFifalse)xi+false(Gi+δGifalse)ui, where x i + 1 and x i are the discrete states of truex˜, u i is the discrete input of u 2 , F i ≃ I + Λ 2 T , GiΩ2T12 and T is the sample time. The terms δF i and δG i represent parameter uncertainties of the WMR.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section, the robust control approaches we are proposing is given in terms of discrete-time systems. In this sense, (10) can be discretized according to [23], in the following way…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%