2017
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0836.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, Version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, Validations, and Intercomparisons

Abstract: The monthly global 28 3 28 Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) has been revised and updated from version 4 to version 5. This update incorporates a new release of ICOADS release 3.0 (R3.0), a decade of near-surface data from Argo floats, and a new estimate of centennial sea ice from HadISST2. A number of choices in aspects of quality control, bias adjustment, and interpolation have been substantively revised. The resulting ERSST estimates have more realistic spatiotemporal variations, better… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
1,499
1
21

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,279 publications
(1,696 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
15
1,499
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…ENSO events are identified based on the November through February (NDJF) seasonal mean SST anomalies in the ERSSTv5 dataset (Huang et al 2017) with a 1981-2010 base period. EN events are identified when SST anomalies in the Niño3.4 region (5S-5N, 170W-120W), are larger than 0.5 K, and LN events are identified when SST anomalies in this region are more negative than − 0.5 K. EN and LN events are further categorized into four groups similar to Hurwitz et al (2014): Eastern Pacific (EP) EN, characterized by positive SST anomalies in the Niño-3 region (5S-5N, 210E-270E), and Central Pacific (CP) EN, characterized by positive SST anomalies in the Niño-4 region (5S-5N, 160E-210E), as well as EP and CP LN events, characterized by negative SST anomalies in the same two regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENSO events are identified based on the November through February (NDJF) seasonal mean SST anomalies in the ERSSTv5 dataset (Huang et al 2017) with a 1981-2010 base period. EN events are identified when SST anomalies in the Niño3.4 region (5S-5N, 170W-120W), are larger than 0.5 K, and LN events are identified when SST anomalies in this region are more negative than − 0.5 K. EN and LN events are further categorized into four groups similar to Hurwitz et al (2014): Eastern Pacific (EP) EN, characterized by positive SST anomalies in the Niño-3 region (5S-5N, 210E-270E), and Central Pacific (CP) EN, characterized by positive SST anomalies in the Niño-4 region (5S-5N, 160E-210E), as well as EP and CP LN events, characterized by negative SST anomalies in the same two regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical temperatures were also constrained using the Had-CRUT4 dataset without infilling (Morice et al, 2012), along with the GISTEMP (Hansen et al, 2010), Berkeley Earth (Berkeley Earth, 2017) and NOAA (Zhang et al, 2017) observational datasets. The linear 1880-2016 trends are 0.91 ± 0.18 K, 0.99±0.22 K, 1.07±0.16 K and 0.93±0.24 K respectively.…”
Section: Historical Temperature Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stripes near 30°E and 60°W in the TCWV panel indicate land surfaces over which TCWV data are unavailable. The onset of the 1997-98 El Niño, as defined by the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) (calculated using the three-month running mean of Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) v5 [47] SST anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region (5°N-5°S, 120°-170°W)), started in May 1997. Both the TCWV and UTH series show that preceding this El Niño event (at the end of 1996), there was a positive anomaly of water vapor near 5a-c shows that the three El Niño events all exhibited the strongest positive anomalies over the equatorial central Pacific, extending to the eastern Pacific.…”
Section: Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%