2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1617-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended post-mortem delay times should not be viewed as a deterrent to the scientific investigation of human brain tissue: a study from the Brains for Dementia Research Network Neuropathology Study Group, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the sensitivity of different tissues to PMI-associated mRNA degradation shows distinct gene to gene differences, and in a given tissue, numbers of PMI-associated genes vary dramatically from none to 2,763. For example, mRNAs in the central nervous system show more stability than those in the digestive tract tissues (e.g., esophageal mucosa), which is consistent with previous studies 11, 25 . Of particular interest, we found that even different regions in the same tissue may have significantly different sensitivities to postmortem mRNA degradation, and differing numbers of PMI-associated genes may be identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found that the sensitivity of different tissues to PMI-associated mRNA degradation shows distinct gene to gene differences, and in a given tissue, numbers of PMI-associated genes vary dramatically from none to 2,763. For example, mRNAs in the central nervous system show more stability than those in the digestive tract tissues (e.g., esophageal mucosa), which is consistent with previous studies 11, 25 . Of particular interest, we found that even different regions in the same tissue may have significantly different sensitivities to postmortem mRNA degradation, and differing numbers of PMI-associated genes may be identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although there are no studies that have analyzed the influence of the post-mortem delay on DNA methylation, previous reports did not find any effect on pH, RNA quality [ 43 ], or protein concentration (post-synaptic proteins [ 44 ] and primary microglia [ 45 ]) in brain. Therefore, we considered that the difference in post-mortem delay between both groups, healthy controls, and PD cases would not affect our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research showed conflicting results on how PMD affects the stability of RNA in brain tissue. In some studies, total RNA was shown to be well‐preserved in postmortem brain tissue, and RNA degradation did not correlate with PMD (Cummings, Strum, Yoon, Szymanski, & Hulette, 2001; Ervin et al, 2007; Johnson, Morgan, & Finch, 1986; Kobayashi et al, 1990; Robinson et al, 2016), but rather with other factors such as tissue handling, brain pH (homogenate) and agonal state (Durrenberger et al, 2010; Harrison et al, 1995; Preece & Cairns, 2003; Robinson et al, 2016). In addition, degradation of selective gene transcripts was monitored from brain tissues with different postmortem intervals by PCR, and no correlation between degradation of specific mRNAs and postmortem interval were detected for the PMDs investigated (Heinrich, Matt, Lutz‐Bonengel, & Schmidt, 2007; Kobayashi et al, 1990; Koppelkamm, Vennemann, Lutz‐Bonengel, Fracasso, & Vennemann, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%