2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-013-0270-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Poisson–Nernst–Planck modeling of membrane blockage via insoluble reaction products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 To use the applied potential to control reaction conditions within a nanopore, it is essential that the local electric field and ion distribution are understood. Most understanding in this area comes from finite element method (FEM) simulation of the continuum Poisson−Nernst−Planck model, 1,3,4,13,16 with the Navier−Stokes equation also added to account for electroosmotic flow (EOF) 17 and speciation reactions to account for solution equilibria. 16 While providing significant insight, these models also make a number of assumptions that have not yet been tested adequately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 To use the applied potential to control reaction conditions within a nanopore, it is essential that the local electric field and ion distribution are understood. Most understanding in this area comes from finite element method (FEM) simulation of the continuum Poisson−Nernst−Planck model, 1,3,4,13,16 with the Navier−Stokes equation also added to account for electroosmotic flow (EOF) 17 and speciation reactions to account for solution equilibria. 16 While providing significant insight, these models also make a number of assumptions that have not yet been tested adequately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most understanding in this area comes from finite element method (FEM) simulation of the continuum Poisson−Nernst−Planck model, 1,3,4,13,16 with the Navier−Stokes equation also added to account for electroosmotic flow (EOF) 17 and speciation reactions to account for solution equilibria. 16 While providing significant insight, these models also make a number of assumptions that have not yet been tested adequately. In particular, original nanopore simulation geometries focused on nanoporous membranes, where the pore wall was effectively infinitely thick and was represented with a surface charge boundary condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%