2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-021-01398-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended model of shear modulus reduction for cohesive soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure4shows the effect of relative density on the dynamic properties of granular soils. The results show that with an increase in relative density, G/Gmax increases, and D decreases, aligning with prior research findings[60][61][62]. Further elaboration and comprehensive findings stemming from these tests have been disseminated through detailed publications by Bayat and Ghalandarzadeh[58,63].…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Figure4shows the effect of relative density on the dynamic properties of granular soils. The results show that with an increase in relative density, G/Gmax increases, and D decreases, aligning with prior research findings[60][61][62]. Further elaboration and comprehensive findings stemming from these tests have been disseminated through detailed publications by Bayat and Ghalandarzadeh[58,63].…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The soil stiffness or shear modulus G at small to large strains generally results from the material properties of the soil (grain characteristics, plasticity, void ratio, cementation), the stress state or stress history (overconsolidation ratio, mean effective stress) and the dynamic loading characteristics (frequency, number of cycles, drained/undrained conditions). However, factors that significantly influence G are the engineering shear strain amplitude γ, soil plasticity index PI and effective stress σ ′ [8,9].…”
Section: Assessment Of Soil Stiffness At Small Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ottawa sand No. 20 This equation has a relatively large scatter indicating the difficulty of obtaining a correlation for the strain-dependent shear stiffness that would be reliable for a wide variety of granular soils. Therefore, a different approach can model the dynamic behavior of soil at larger strain levels.…”
Section: Soil Tested D50 [Mm] Cu [-] a [-] F(e) [-] N [-] Referencementioning
confidence: 99%