2015
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2015.00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Model-Based Feedforward Compensation in ℒ1 Adaptive Control for Mechanical Manipulators: Design and Experiments

Abstract: This paper deals with a new control scheme for parallel kinematic manipulators (PKMs) based on the L 1 adaptive control theory. The original L 1 adaptive controller is extended by including an adaptive loop based on the dynamics of the PKM. The additional modelbased term is in charge of the compensation of the modeled non-linear dynamics in the aim of improving the tracking performance. Moreover, the proposed controller is enhanced to reduce the internal forces, which may appear in the case of redundantly actu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several control techniques have been proposed and studied in the literature starting from the non-model-based non-adaptive and adaptive controllers, ending up with model-based non-adaptive and adaptive controllers. One can mention few examples from the aforementioned classes of control implemented on PKMs respectively: Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) [29,18], nonlinear PID [25], Augmented PD (APD) [28], Adaptive Feedforward plus PD [2,17], Desired Compensation Adaptive Control Law (DCAL) [12], Adaptive controller based on the Robust Integral of the Sign of the Error (RISE) [13], Feedforward Compensation in L1 Adaptive Control [14]. This chapter introduces a five-degree-of-freedom redundantly actuated PKM named ARROW 1 characterized by the good compromise between rapidity and precision developed for machining tasks.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several control techniques have been proposed and studied in the literature starting from the non-model-based non-adaptive and adaptive controllers, ending up with model-based non-adaptive and adaptive controllers. One can mention few examples from the aforementioned classes of control implemented on PKMs respectively: Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) [29,18], nonlinear PID [25], Augmented PD (APD) [28], Adaptive Feedforward plus PD [2,17], Desired Compensation Adaptive Control Law (DCAL) [12], Adaptive controller based on the Robust Integral of the Sign of the Error (RISE) [13], Feedforward Compensation in L1 Adaptive Control [14]. This chapter introduces a five-degree-of-freedom redundantly actuated PKM named ARROW 1 characterized by the good compromise between rapidity and precision developed for machining tasks.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the drawbacks of the L 1 adaptive control is the time lag. Researchers in [13][14][15] have proposed to add different supplementary controllers aiming to eliminate the appearing time lag. In this paper, the proposed contribution is the L 1 adaptive fractional control based on fractional calculus [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed control structure formed by a dynamic feedforward term, a feedback supertwisting term, and a stabilizing feedback term, can be more adequate for real-time implementations. Moreover, this control scheme can be easily applied to the general class of robotic manipulators whose dynamics is described by (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%