2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.147001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Magnetic Dome Induced by Low Pressures in Superconducting FeSe1xSx

Abstract: We report muon spin rotation (µSR) and magnetization measurements under pressure on Fe 1+δ Se1-xSx with x ≈ 0.11. We find an extended dome of long range magnetic order above p ≈ 0.6 GPa spanning a pressure range between previously reported separated magnetic phases. The magnetism initially competes with coexisting superconductivity leading to a local maximum and minimum of the superconducting Tc(p). The maximum of Tc corresponds to the onset of magnetism while the minimum coincides with the pressure of stronge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…under pressure. It is also worth mentioning that no signatures of an AFM order were observed in 1/T 1 T as well as the NMR spectra, in contrast to the recent muon spin rotation (μSR) report on FeSe 0.89 S 0.11 under pressure [21]. It is not clear, at present, the reason why the AFM state reported by the μSR measurements is not detected by our NMR and resistivity measurements.…”
contrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…under pressure. It is also worth mentioning that no signatures of an AFM order were observed in 1/T 1 T as well as the NMR spectra, in contrast to the recent muon spin rotation (μSR) report on FeSe 0.89 S 0.11 under pressure [21]. It is not clear, at present, the reason why the AFM state reported by the μSR measurements is not detected by our NMR and resistivity measurements.…”
contrasting
confidence: 97%
“…With the application of pressure on FeSe 1−x S x , the nematic state can also be suppressed, and an AFM state is induced [19,20]. The three-dimensional T -p-x phase diagram up to p = 8 GPa has been reported by Matsuura et al [19] in which the AFM ordered phase shifts to higher p with increasing x, although a different phase diagram of FeSe 0.89 S 0.11 having a wide AFM region was recently reported [21]. Recent resistivity measurements under high magnetic fields on FeSe 0.89 S 0.11 under pressure reported a lack of nematic quantum criticality and the presence of Fermi-liquid behavior [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Given that in KFe 2 As 2 bulk superconductivity is observed up to at least P 6 GPa [10], we conclude that for P > 1.8 GPa bulk magnetism and bulk superconductivity coexist within the whole sample volume. Note that a similar type of bulk coexistence between the antiferromagnetic order and superconductivity was previously reported for various compounds belonging to the so-called 11 [29][30][31][32][33][34][35], 122 [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], 1144 [52][53][54][55], and 21311 [56] families of Fe-SCs.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar ideas were recently also brought forward by theoretical considerations. [ 175 ] However, the notion of a nematic quantum‐critical point in the absence of magnetism was recently questioned by μSR measurements under pressure [ 176 ] on samples with the same S concentration, that is, FeSe 0.89 S 0.11 . Their main finding was that the magnetic dome spans to pressures as low as 0.6 GPa, which is much lower than previously reported and right in the same pressure range of the previously proposed pc for a purely nematic quantum‐critical point.…”
Section: Effect Of Hydrostatic Pressure On Superconductivity Magnetimentioning
confidence: 99%