2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac16bc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended imaging volume in cone-beam x-ray tomography using the weighted simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique

Abstract: An issue in computerized X-ray tomography is the limited size of available detectors relative to objects of interest. A solution was provided in the past two decades by positioning the detector in a lateral offset position, increasing the effective field of view (FOV) and thus the diameter of the reconstructed volume. However, this introduced artifacts in the obtained reconstructions, caused by projection truncation and data redundancy. These issues can be addressed by incorporating an additional data weightin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extend the FOV, the detector was shifted laterally by 70 mm to provide an effective FOV of 187 mm (width) ´100 mm (height), as illustrated in figure 2(b). The detector offset CBCT geometry has been investigated in the past (Cho et al 1996, Wang 2002, Li et al 2007, Sanctorum et al 2021 and implemented in several commercial dental CBCT systems (Scarfe and Farman 2008) and a prototype breast CBCT (Tseng et al 2021). The geometry of the ms-CBCT scanner was calibrated by measuring a phantom with two stainless steel beads embedded in an acrylic slab, following the method described by Yang et al (2006).…”
Section: Benchtop Testing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the FOV, the detector was shifted laterally by 70 mm to provide an effective FOV of 187 mm (width) ´100 mm (height), as illustrated in figure 2(b). The detector offset CBCT geometry has been investigated in the past (Cho et al 1996, Wang 2002, Li et al 2007, Sanctorum et al 2021 and implemented in several commercial dental CBCT systems (Scarfe and Farman 2008) and a prototype breast CBCT (Tseng et al 2021). The geometry of the ms-CBCT scanner was calibrated by measuring a phantom with two stainless steel beads embedded in an acrylic slab, following the method described by Yang et al (2006).…”
Section: Benchtop Testing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setting of the thinnest layer thickness is not random. It is closely related to several main performance parameters, namely, cone-shaped X-ray harness reconstruction mathematics, scanning speed, X-ray dose, computer performance, and voxel isotropy, which is highly valued in clinical applications [10][11][12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expanded FOV covers the entire maxillofacial region of a patient without data truncation when scanning with a full gantry rotation. In this detector offset geometry which is also used in other imaging systems (Santaella et al 2020, Sanctorum et al 2021, each x-ray exposure covers slightly over half of the FOV. For volumetric CT imaging, the N source number of collimated sources were electronically scanned across the object N view times, as the gantry rotated around the object around the object by 360 degrees.…”
Section: Multisource Cbctmentioning
confidence: 99%