1991
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-54430-5_95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Horn clauses: the framework and some semantics

Abstract: The purpoee of this paper is twofold: to introduce a new extension of concurrent logic programming languages aiming at handling synchronicity and to present and compare several semantics for it. The extended framework -ntially rests on an extension of Horn clauses, including multiple atoms in their head.a and a guard construct, u well u. a new operator between goals. The semantics discUlllled conaiat of four semantics. They range in the operational, declarative and denotational types and are issued both from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other languages similar to µLog include Gamma (Banatre and Le Métayer, 1993), LO (Andreoli and Pareschi, 1991), Communicating Clauses (Jacquet and Monteiro, 1992), and the mechanism proposed in Brogi (1990). All of them transform in one way or another a multiset of elements into another one.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other languages similar to µLog include Gamma (Banatre and Le Métayer, 1993), LO (Andreoli and Pareschi, 1991), Communicating Clauses (Jacquet and Monteiro, 1992), and the mechanism proposed in Brogi (1990). All of them transform in one way or another a multiset of elements into another one.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 96%
“…GroupLog defines extensions to the Extended Horn Clause language (EHC) [29], that are supported at two levels: L1, defines agents as program units and L2 defines groups of agents. A GroupLog system contains concurrently executing agents able to: (1) communicate through interface predicates, and (2) join groups to coordinate their activities.…”
Section: The Language Grouplogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GroupLog system contains concurrently executing agents able to: (1) communicate through interface predicates, and (2) join groups to coordinate their activities. In the following, we first summarize EHC (see [29]), and then describe the two mentioned levels.…”
Section: The Language Grouplogmentioning
confidence: 99%