2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended higher cup-product Chern–Simons theories

Abstract: Abstract. The proper action functional of (4k + 3)-dimensional U (1)-Chern-Simons theory including the instanton sectors has a well known description: it is given on the moduli space of fields by the fiber integration of the cup product square of classes in degree-(2k + 2) differential cohomology. We first refine this statement from the moduli space to the full higher smooth moduli stack of fields, to which the higher-order-ghost BRST complex is the infinitesimal approximation. Then we generalize the refined f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reflected in the fact that non‐homotopy theory has no answer to the evident followup question; if 2‐cocycles classify central extensions, then: “Whatdohighercocyclesclassify?”For example, the Lie algebra su(n) itself (for n2) carries no non‐trivial 2‐cocycle, but it carries, a non‐trivial 3‐cocycle (in fact precisely one, up to rescaling) given on elements x,y,zsu(n) by μ3(x,y,z)=true〈x,[y,z]false⟩0.16em,where [,] is the Lie bracket, and , the Killing form. This cocycle controls both the SU( n ) WZW‐model as well as SU( n )p‐Chern‐Simons theory (see [] for the higher‐structure perspective on this phenomenon) and hence is crucial both in field theory (gauge instantons) as well as in string theory (rational CFT compactifications).…”
Section: Higher Structure From Higher Cocyclesmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is reflected in the fact that non‐homotopy theory has no answer to the evident followup question; if 2‐cocycles classify central extensions, then: “Whatdohighercocyclesclassify?”For example, the Lie algebra su(n) itself (for n2) carries no non‐trivial 2‐cocycle, but it carries, a non‐trivial 3‐cocycle (in fact precisely one, up to rescaling) given on elements x,y,zsu(n) by μ3(x,y,z)=true〈x,[y,z]false⟩0.16em,where [,] is the Lie bracket, and , the Killing form. This cocycle controls both the SU( n ) WZW‐model as well as SU( n )p‐Chern‐Simons theory (see [] for the higher‐structure perspective on this phenomenon) and hence is crucial both in field theory (gauge instantons) as well as in string theory (rational CFT compactifications).…”
Section: Higher Structure From Higher Cocyclesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…where [−, −] is the Lie bracket, and −, − the Killing form. This cocycle controls both the SU(n) WZW-model as well as SU(n)p-Chern-Simons theory (see [55,78,79] for the higher-structure perspective on this phenomenon) and hence is crucial both in field theory (gauge instantons) as well as in string theory (rational CFT compactifications).…”
Section: Higher Structure From Higher Cocyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, fiber integration of n-connections, hence fiber integration of cocycles in ordinary differential cohomology of degree (p + 2), is equivalently encoded [18] in a morphism of smooth higher stacks of the form…”
Section: Transgression To Ordinary Lie Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can also add source terms and also impose self-duality by hand, in which case the action (1.1) might be referred to as a pseudo-action (see [1]). Recent accounts of higher abelian gauge theory in this context, via differential cohomology, are given in [15,16,17,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the partition function to be defined as a section of a line bundle over the intermediate Jacobian, and requires a quadratic refinement [39]. Discussions on extension to (higher) differential cohomology and stacks are given in [15,16,17]. The formulation that we propose via noncommutative geometry does not suffer from such an immediate problem, because ultimately H 2p+1 ∧ θ H 2p+1 = 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%