2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended High-frequency Audiometry (9000–20000Hz). Usefulness in Audiological Diagnosis

Abstract: Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in:Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española 67.1 (2016) Abstract Early detection and appropriate treatment of hearing loss are essential to min-imise the consequences of hearing loss. In addition to conventional audiometry (125---8000 Hz), extended high-frequency audiometry (9000---20 000 Hz) is available. This type of audiometry may be useful in early diagnosis of hearing loss in certain conditions, such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In humans, these ages equate approximately with adolescence and early adulthood respectively, thus it may be that humans who sustain noise exposure while teenagers might be expected to have poorer HF and EHF thresholds than those first exposed at a later age. Taken together, these findings suggest that elevated EHF thresholds are an early indicator that subclinical damage has occurred and it may be prudent to test thresholds at some or all of these frequencies for patients who present with speech-in-noise difficulties or suspected noise damage (Rodríguez Valiente et al, 2016). 4.5.…”
Section: Extended High Frequency Hearingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In humans, these ages equate approximately with adolescence and early adulthood respectively, thus it may be that humans who sustain noise exposure while teenagers might be expected to have poorer HF and EHF thresholds than those first exposed at a later age. Taken together, these findings suggest that elevated EHF thresholds are an early indicator that subclinical damage has occurred and it may be prudent to test thresholds at some or all of these frequencies for patients who present with speech-in-noise difficulties or suspected noise damage (Rodríguez Valiente et al, 2016). 4.5.…”
Section: Extended High Frequency Hearingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, studies using extended high‐frequency audiometry (8 kHz–16 kHz) reported downward threshold shifts in patients who had a history of recurrent acute otitis media. The extended high‐frequency audiometry, although not validated for clinical use, is used to monitor patients under a high risk of hearing loss (who work in noisy environments, who will be subjected to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, or who have tinnitus with normal thresholds in the standard audiometry) . Although mainly used in research, extended high‐frequency audiometry is also used in some clinical protocols to detect early changes to the auditory thresholds and to plan early intervention when possible …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 C) nor hearing thresholds in the standard audiometric range (using a pure tone average of thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) (t(19.371) = − 1.560, p = 0.135). We also compared the groups with respect to their EHF audiometry (10–16 kHz), a measurement considered more sensitive to subclinical levels of OHC loss than the other two measures 31 , 36 , and the groups did not differ on this measure either (a pure tone average of thresholds at 10, 12.5, 14, and 16 kHz) across ears (t(7.418) = − 0.551, p = 0.598). (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the TEOAEs assayed in this study may not be sensitive enough to reveal changes in sensitivity, especially in revealing changes to high frequency hearing at the base of the cochlea. Once enrolled in the study, participants underwent detailed evaluation that included EHF audiometry (8–16 kHz) as a secondary indicator of early hearing damage 36 and a three week dosimetry protocol to objectively measure daily average noise exposure levels and evaluate risk of noise-induced hearing loss. To capture sound levels representative of daily routines, participants wore a noise dosimeter clipped to their clothing for a total of ~ 21 days, spread across an academic year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%