2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended gamma-ray emission of the solar flares in june 1991

Abstract: Abstract. During the solar flares on 9, 11, and 15 June 1991 the COMPTEL instrument measured extended γ-radiation in the 2.223 MeV neutron-capture line, in prompt nuclear deexcitation lines and in pion-decay radiation for several hours after the flares. The long-term time profiles can be described by a double exponential decay with decay constants on the order of 10 min for the fast and several 100 min for the slow components. We studied the 11 June 1991 flare in more detail and found that during the extended … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the extended phases of the flares of 1991 June 11 and 15 were marked by strong similarities of the decay phases of the 2.22 MeV neutron-capture line, the 4Y7 MeV nuclear deexcitation lines, and the 0 -decay emission. While the close matching of the nuclear line and 0 -decay emissions might be challenging in terms of our proposed SEP-SW sources, they are also inconsistent with trapping of SEPs in the solar corona (Rank et al 2001), which requires a gradually hardening spectrum.…”
Section: Temporal Separations Of Flare and Interplanetary -Raysmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the extended phases of the flares of 1991 June 11 and 15 were marked by strong similarities of the decay phases of the 2.22 MeV neutron-capture line, the 4Y7 MeV nuclear deexcitation lines, and the 0 -decay emission. While the close matching of the nuclear line and 0 -decay emissions might be challenging in terms of our proposed SEP-SW sources, they are also inconsistent with trapping of SEPs in the solar corona (Rank et al 2001), which requires a gradually hardening spectrum.…”
Section: Temporal Separations Of Flare and Interplanetary -Raysmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, no 0 -decay emission was observed during the impulsive phase (Rank et al 2001) of that flare. In general, the extended phases of the flares of 1991 June 11 and 15 were marked by strong similarities of the decay phases of the 2.22 MeV neutron-capture line, the 4Y7 MeV nuclear deexcitation lines, and the 0 -decay emission.…”
Section: Temporal Separations Of Flare and Interplanetary -Raysmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Alternatively, the particles could have been accelerated in large static loops filled with MHD turbulence (Ryan and Lee 1991), in the electrostatic potential behind the CME in the reconnection sheet (Litvinenko and Somov 1995), or in an episodical acceleration process (van den Oord 1993) with successive episodes of particle acceleration and subsequent trapping for moderately long times (Mandzhavidze et al 1996). For the June 1991 LDGRF, Rank et al (2001) suggest a continuous though evolving acceleration process.…”
Section: Interacting and Escaping Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smooth light curves of soft X-ray emission tell us that the energy released by each impact of plasma blobs is small compared to the total energy. Shocks and turbulences are favorable conditions for extended high-energy phenomena lasting several hours (Rank et al 2001). Information about the falling mass is not available from the observations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%