2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended fragility surfaces for unreinforced masonry walls using vision-derived damage parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed statistical method, the Box‐counting method, contains five major phases; the steps for generating a 3D fragility surface are schematically shown in Figure 13. Note worthing that the main idea of the Box‐counting method was previously published by the authors of the current study 69 …”
Section: Generating 3d Fragility Surfacementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed statistical method, the Box‐counting method, contains five major phases; the steps for generating a 3D fragility surface are schematically shown in Figure 13. Note worthing that the main idea of the Box‐counting method was previously published by the authors of the current study 69 …”
Section: Generating 3d Fragility Surfacementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In recent years, several studies investigated image‐based damage features to find a strong indicator that is able to express the state of damaged structural components. For instance, the extent and complexity of crack patterns quantified through fractal theory have been widely used to assess structural integrity 8‐10,69,70 . In particular, Hamidia et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies between fragilit curves implied the importance of considering aspect ratio during the fragility analysis. Additional experimentally based fragility curves and performance assessments fo masonry walls with different configurations are available in other studies, for example URM walls [237][238][239], RM shear walls [232], and RM walls with boundary elements o confined masonry walls [240,241]. With the advancement of damage detection technology researchers began exploring the application of such technology for crack detection.…”
Section: Moderate Diagonal Shear Damage (Ds4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement results were further used for the qualitative damage state identification and corresponding fragility function devel opment. Although significant efforts have been devoted to the experimentally based fra gility analysis and performance assessment of masonry walls, no studies are available fo Additional experimentally based fragility curves and performance assessments for masonry walls with different configurations are available in other studies, for example, URM walls [237][238][239], RM shear walls [232], and RM walls with boundary elements or confined masonry walls [240,241]. With the advancement of damage detection technology, researchers began exploring the application of such technology for crack detection.…”
Section: Moderate Diagonal Shear Damage (Ds4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation