2008 International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icst.2008.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Finite State Machine Based Test Derivation Driven by User Defined Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Duale et al [4] presented a method combined with symbolic execution, linear programming and graph splitting to eliminate conflicts in a class of EFSMs. El-Fakih et al studied EFSM test generation with user defined faults [5]. Kalaji et al [6]- [8] applied Genetic Algorithm on feasible paths generation.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duale et al [4] presented a method combined with symbolic execution, linear programming and graph splitting to eliminate conflicts in a class of EFSMs. El-Fakih et al studied EFSM test generation with user defined faults [5]. Kalaji et al [6]- [8] applied Genetic Algorithm on feasible paths generation.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the approach in [11], but a proposed technique allows to derive such a slice preserving more transitions of the initial EFSM [3]. The idea behind the approach is to delete transitions from the initial EFSM which have predicates that significanty depend on values of context variables.…”
Section: B Context-free Efsm Slicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is well elaborated only for two configurations and there still is the execution problem for an obtained distinguishing sequence, since not every parameterized input sequence that takes the product of two initial EFSMs from the initial state to a f ail state is executable. Another way is to distinguish not configurations but states of the EFSM using context-free slices of an EFSM that are very close to classical FSMs and correspondingly, there is no problem to execute a derived distinguishing sequence [11]. In this paper, we consider two such slices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFSM model is used as the underlying model for a number of popular specification techniques, such as Statecharts (Harel & Naamad 1996), SDL (ITU-T 1994) and UML (OMG 2002). EFSM based related testing problems, test derivation approaches, and applications domains are given in several papers such as (Bochmann & Petrenko 1994;Bourhfir et al 2001;Cavalli et al 2003;Ramalingom et al 2003;El-Fakih et al 2003;Petrenko et al 2004;El-Fakih et al 2008;Sugeta et al 2004;Jia & Harman 2011;Keum et al 2006;Wong et al 2009). Furthermore, an extension of the EFSM model to specify and test timed systems is considered in (Merayo et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in test derivation, checking if a transition of the black-box Implementation Under Test (IUT) transfers wrongly from a current state involves distinguishing a next reference configuration from some other configurations of the specification EFSM as described in (Bochmann & Petrenko 1994;Bourhfir et al 2001;Ramalingom et al 2003;Petrenko et al 2004;El-Fakih et al 2008). The set of configurations that one would like to distinguish from a given configuration is called a "black-list" of "suspicious configurations" in (Petrenko et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%