2001
DOI: 10.1109/78.969510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended fast fixed-order RLS adaptive filters

Abstract: The existing derivations of conventional fast RLS adaptive filters are intrinsically dependent on the shift structure in the input regression vectors. This structure arises when a tapped-delay line (FIR) filter is used as a modeling filter. In this paper, we show, unlike what original derivations may suggest, that fast fixed-order RLS adaptive algorithms are not limited to FIR filter structures. We show that fast recursions in both explicit and array forms exist for more general data structures, such as orthon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, these minimal components for the FIR case can be established, once the connection with the minimal components of fast transversal filters of all least-squares orders is recognized, thus resulting in a 2M + 1 minimal dimension (see [17]). We have shown in [3], for the general orthonormal basis of this paper, that the same defining components of the minimum state vector in a fast transversal FIR algorithm also define the minimum components of an orthonormalitybased FTF, 3 therefore, using the arguments of [17], one can conclude that this holds similarly for the order-recursive algorithms of this paper, resulting in 2M + 1 minimal parameters. The nonminimal character of the above recursions can be intuitively seen, by following their derivation.…”
Section: Backward Consistency and Minimality Issuesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Now, these minimal components for the FIR case can be established, once the connection with the minimal components of fast transversal filters of all least-squares orders is recognized, thus resulting in a 2M + 1 minimal dimension (see [17]). We have shown in [3], for the general orthonormal basis of this paper, that the same defining components of the minimum state vector in a fast transversal FIR algorithm also define the minimum components of an orthonormalitybased FTF, 3 therefore, using the arguments of [17], one can conclude that this holds similarly for the order-recursive algorithms of this paper, resulting in 2M + 1 minimal parameters. The nonminimal character of the above recursions can be intuitively seen, by following their derivation.…”
Section: Backward Consistency and Minimality Issuesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This relation helps in reducing the redundant variables in fast RLS recursions and is one of the relations forming the manifold of S i in such recursions (as observed for the FTF algorithm in [15,16] in the case of FIR models). 4 This relation has been further extended to the general orthonormal model of [3] and has been used in the standard and it turns out that this is also the case for the lattice recursions, since we have shown that this relation holds for every order-M LS problem.…”
Section: Backward Consistency and Minimality Issuesmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the physiological interference, the RLS adaptive filtering algorithm was used to remove the correlated components of reference signal x(t) from signal d(t) by minimizing the following mean square error [13].…”
Section: Recursive Least-squares Adaptive Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TSP.2013.2278150 instead of relying on Gauss elimination computations, recursive solutions require by exploiting the sequential least-squares structure of a given data, or even multiplications per iteration, by relying on additional data structure [8], [10]- [12]. A fast algorithm is by itself one way of proving the so-called displacement structure, tracing back the works [13]- [29] for inversion of Toeplitz matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%