2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-010-1988-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended evaluation of the safety and efficacy of GAD treatment of children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Aims/hypothesis The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of alum formulated glutamic acid decarboxylase GAD 65 (GAD-alum) treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes after 4 years of follow-up. Methods Seventy children and adolescents aged 10-18 years with recent onset type 1 diabetes participated in a phase II, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients identified as possible participants attended one of eight clinics in Sweden to receive inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, at 30 mo post-trial initiation, this parameter was stable and significantly increased for a period up to 4 y. 129 Also the stimulated C-peptide secretion was significantly higher than the placebo group at both 15 and 30 mo. However, these differences were only seen in a subpopulation of patients treated within 6 mo of diagnosis.…”
Section: No Effect 109mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, at 30 mo post-trial initiation, this parameter was stable and significantly increased for a period up to 4 y. 129 Also the stimulated C-peptide secretion was significantly higher than the placebo group at both 15 and 30 mo. However, these differences were only seen in a subpopulation of patients treated within 6 mo of diagnosis.…”
Section: No Effect 109mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…107 Again no treatment-related SAE or AE could be determined, not even after 4 y of follow up. 129 However the primary endpoint, a change in fasting C-peptide after 15 mo in comparison to placebo, was not achieved. Nevertheless, at 30 mo post-trial initiation, this parameter was stable and significantly increased for a period up to 4 y.…”
Section: No Effect 109mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shorter disease duration at inclusion, and no serious treatment-related adverse events were reported [243]. [234].…”
Section: Phase II Trial In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For this reason, therapies that modulate the immune response to cells and cell antigens also exist, and their safety and efficacy have been or are currently being tested in clinical trials (Bluestone, Herold et al 2010;WaldronLynch and Herold 2011). GAD65 specific-antigen-based immunotherapy with alum adjuvant demonstrated preservation of C-peptide fasting levels in younger new-onset patients four years after treatment (Ludvigsson, Hjorth et al 2011), but this was not supported in the larger Phase III trial (Ludvigsson, Krisky et al 2012). Humanized anti-CD3 antibody (in which human Fc immunoglobulin domains are engineered to mouse CD3-binding portions of the antibody) therapy given in a single dose reduced the decline of insulin production and the amount of exogenous insulin required in the patients (Herold, Gitelman et al 2009).…”
Section: Current Therapies For Tidmentioning
confidence: 99%