1985
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90081-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended energy loss fine structure in reflection electron energy loss spectra of Cu and Ni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our results indicate that the Au5p 3/2 electron energy loss can successfully be used in the Extended Energy Loss Fine Structure method for determination of nearest neighbor distance of gold atoms in the solid state surface layer. This thesis can be supported by the circumstance that the difference 0.15Å mentioned above is not greater than such difference found for shallow levels of copper and nickel in [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Nearest Neighbor Distances Found and These Known From Literamentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our results indicate that the Au5p 3/2 electron energy loss can successfully be used in the Extended Energy Loss Fine Structure method for determination of nearest neighbor distance of gold atoms in the solid state surface layer. This thesis can be supported by the circumstance that the difference 0.15Å mentioned above is not greater than such difference found for shallow levels of copper and nickel in [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Nearest Neighbor Distances Found and These Known From Literamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As a result, information obtained with the use of EELFS concerns the surface layer of the sample investigated while information given by EXAFS is rather connected with the bulk. For this reason, shallow core levels (M 2,3 levels of 3d transition metals) were tested with an appreciable success by a number of authors [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. In [5][6][7][8] differences between distances to the first neighbors measured and these taken from the crystallographic data were in the range of 0.2Å for Cu, Ni or Fe but Guy et al [11] obtained these differences between 0.01 and 0.04Å using more sophisticated mathematical elaboration of experimental results.…”
Section: Extended Energy Loss Fine Structure (Eelfs) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The total phase-shift, which contains contributions from both processes, leads to displacement of the RDF peaks of typically 0.2-0.3 Å from their true values in EXELFS (and EXAFS) analyses. 26,31,32 This total phase-shift depends on the k-range selected for FT and also on the edge type above which the oscillations were selected for the EXELFS analysis. 22 Since a reasonable krange was selected in the present study, and it is known that the experimentally calculated nearest-neighbor distance in the EXELFS analysis differs from the known first nearestneighbor distances reported above by 0.3 6 0.02 Å , a total phase-shift of 0.3 Å was added to the experimental RDF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%