There is an apparent benefit with extension of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) beyond 1 year after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES). Assessment by a Double Randomization of a Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy vs a Monitoring-Guided Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation, and of Treatment Interruption vs Continuation One Year After Stenting (ARCTIC)-Generation assessed whether there is a difference of outcome between first-vs second-generation DES and if there is an interaction with DAPT duration in the ARCTIC-Interruption study. ARCTICInterruption randomly allocated 1259 patients 1 year after stent implantation to a strategy of interruption of DAPT (n = 624), in which aspirin antiplatelet treatment only was maintained, or DAPT continuation (n = 635) for 6 to 18 additional months. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization. A total of 520 and 722 patients received a first-and a second-generation DES, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months (interquartile range, 15-18 months) after randomization, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 (6.2%) and 19 (2.6%) patients with first-and second-generation DES, respectively (hazard ratio: 2.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-4.07, P = 0.004). This was observed irrespective of the strategy of interruption or continuation of DAPT and timing of study recruitment. Major bleeding events occurred in 4 (0.8%) and 3 patients (0.4%) with first-and second-generation DES, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-8.02, P = 0.44). Results did not change after multiple adjustments for potential confounding variables. ARCTIC-Generation showed worse clinical outcome with first-vs second-generation DES, a difference that appeared to persist even with prolonged DAPT. 192 Clin. Cardiol. 39, 4, 192-200 (2016)
IntroductionAlthough more effective than bare-metal stents in preventing restenosis and ischemia, first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), such as paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), demonstrate increased susceptibility to stent thrombosis (ST). 1 -3 Newer-generation DES with thinner strut stent platforms, biocompatible durable or biodegradable polymers, and limus-based antiproliferative agents have an approximately 50% lower risk of definite or probable ST compared with first-generation DES, particularly during the late phase. 4 -7 This lower risk of ST compared with bare-metal stents, 7,8 together with improved survival compared with medical treatment in stable coronary artery disease (CAD), further support a broad use of this technology. 9 Extended-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prevents atherothrombotic events in patients with symptomatic vascular disease, 10,11 with a significant increased risk of major bleeding and a neutral effect on cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. 12 Duration of DAPT after coronary stenting remains a matter of debate. The susceptibility of first-generation DES to ST, du...