2015
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended date/time format (EDTF) in the digital public library of America's metadata: Exploratory analysis

Abstract: Considering the value of dates in the life cycle of the digital resource, capturing and storing dates metadata in a structured way can have a significant impact on information retrieval. There are a number of format conventions in common use for encoding the date and time values; the Extended Date/Time Format (EDTF) is one of the most expressive. This paper presents results of an exploratory analysis of representation of dates in over 8 million metadata records from one of the largest digital aggregators, Digi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research using these large aggregations has included a number of quantitative analysis studies (Eklund et al , 2009; Greenberg, 2001; Tarver et al , 2015; Ward, 2003; Zavalina et al , 2016) to assess particular quality aspects. Generally, these aspects report on field usage (Shreeves et al , 2005) or evaluation of values within a particular field, such as the Dublin Core subject (Harper, 2016; Tarver et al , 2015) or date fields (Zavalina et al , 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research using these large aggregations has included a number of quantitative analysis studies (Eklund et al , 2009; Greenberg, 2001; Tarver et al , 2015; Ward, 2003; Zavalina et al , 2016) to assess particular quality aspects. Generally, these aspects report on field usage (Shreeves et al , 2005) or evaluation of values within a particular field, such as the Dublin Core subject (Harper, 2016; Tarver et al , 2015) or date fields (Zavalina et al , 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some projects have applied metadata quality metrics, particularly those related to completeness -the third most important metadata quality criterion (Park, 2009) -into production systems. These projects include, for example, those presented in Zavalina, Alemneh, Kizhakkethil, Phillips and Tarver, 2015;Király and Büchler, 2018, etc. Aggregations that bring together metadata from different sources inevitably face problems with metadata quality, and because of this, evaluation of metadata gains more and more importance (Hillmann, 2008). Thus, several studies, in their analysis of large collections of metadata, focused on counting instances of data values in metadata and then performing standard descriptive statistics on these counts to better understand collections in an aggregated environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of this research, there were 43 hubs in the DPLA that had contributed between 4,500 and 13 million metadata records to the aggregation. This analysis complements existing research with the DPLA metadata (Harper, 2016;Tarver, Phillips, et al, 2015;O. L. Zavalina, Alemneh, et al, 2015) which provides a large-scale collection of records for understanding the makeup and aggregate patterns in large metadata aggregations.…”
Section: Stagementioning
confidence: 70%
“…This method usually involves several types of analysis, including the aggregation of records to calculate the different elements that are being used across metadata records or the values for the different elements and how they are distributed across records. In some situations researchers have approached the records as a whole, while in other situations a single element or field such as the Dublin Core subject or date element in a metadata aggregation like the Digital Public Library of America were analyzed (Tarver, Phillips, et al, 2015;O. L. Zavalina, Alemneh, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Metadata Quality and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%