2017
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2017.2679129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Chirp Scaling-Baseband Azimuth Scaling-Based Azimuth–Range Decouple $L_{1}$ Regularization for TOPS SAR Imaging via CAMP

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel azimuth-range decouple based L1 regularization imaging approach for the focusing in Terrain Observation by Progressive Scans (TOPS) synthetic aperture radar (SAR). Due to conventional L1 regularization technique requires transferring the two-dimensional (2-D) echo data into a vector and reconstructing the scene via 2-D matrix operations leading to significantly more computational complexity, it very difficult to apply in high-resolution and wide-swath SAR imaging, e.g., TOPS. The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of regularization methods in radar imaging goes back at least to the year 2000 [21,24]. Since the CS theory was proposed in 2006, it has been explored for a wide range of radar [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] and radar imaging applications [4,34,35,36,37,38], including synthetic aperture radar (SAR) [39,40,41,42], inverse SAR (ISAR) [43,44,45], tomographic SAR [46,47,48,49,50,51], three-dimensional (3D) SAR [52,53,54], SAR ground moving target indication (SAR/GMTI) [55,56,57,58,59,60,61], ground penetrating radar (GPR) [62,63,64], and through-the-wall radar (TWR) [65,66,67]. In this paper, we will focus on two-dimensional (2D) imaging radar systems, i.e., SAR, GPR, and TWR.…”
Section: Challenges and Advances In Compressed Sensing-based Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of regularization methods in radar imaging goes back at least to the year 2000 [21,24]. Since the CS theory was proposed in 2006, it has been explored for a wide range of radar [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] and radar imaging applications [4,34,35,36,37,38], including synthetic aperture radar (SAR) [39,40,41,42], inverse SAR (ISAR) [43,44,45], tomographic SAR [46,47,48,49,50,51], three-dimensional (3D) SAR [52,53,54], SAR ground moving target indication (SAR/GMTI) [55,56,57,58,59,60,61], ground penetrating radar (GPR) [62,63,64], and through-the-wall radar (TWR) [65,66,67]. In this paper, we will focus on two-dimensional (2D) imaging radar systems, i.e., SAR, GPR, and TWR.…”
Section: Challenges and Advances In Compressed Sensing-based Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling of the 2D data can be removed by constructing an echo simulation operator to replace the observation matrix, which can effectively relieve the computational complexity [16]. This method has been widely used in TOPS SAR [17], Sliding Spotlight SAR [18], displaced phase center antenna (DPCA) imaging [19], wide-angle SAR (WASAR) [20] and ground moving target indication (GMTI) [21]. We can combine it with automatic parameter estimating methods to achieve an adaptive parameter estimation of the large-scale sparse SAR imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method can reduce imaging time efficiently and improve image performance based on the fully sampled or down-sampled echo data for the sparse region [14,15]. The method has been widely applied to ScanSAR [16], TOPSAR [17], Sliding Spotlight SAR [18] and so on. Quan et al applied sparse signal processing methods to nonuniform displace phase center sampling SAR imaging [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%