1988
DOI: 10.1109/65.3233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended bridge algorithms for large networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sincoskie and Cotton [27] propose a multicast routing algorithm for link-layer bridges which supports a type of group in which all senders must also be members of the group. Such groups are acceptable for some applications, such as computer conferencing, but are not well suited to the common client/server type of communication where the (client) senders are generally not members of the (server) group and should not receive packets sent to the group.…”
Section: Hierarchical Multicast Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sincoskie and Cotton [27] propose a multicast routing algorithm for link-layer bridges which supports a type of group in which all senders must also be members of the group. Such groups are acceptable for some applications, such as computer conferencing, but are not well suited to the common client/server type of communication where the (client) senders are generally not members of the (server) group and should not receive packets sent to the group.…”
Section: Hierarchical Multicast Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would come up with ways for scaling multicasting, enabling mobility, and reducing extraneous broadcasting in the network. The work was published in IEEE Network in 1988 [2]. 1…”
Section: Ethernet Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sincoskie and Cotton [25] propose a multicast routing algorithm for link-layer bridges which supports a type of group in which all senders must also be members of the group. Such groups are acceptable for some applications, such as computer confereociog, but are not well suited to the commoo client/server type of communication where the (client) senders are generally not members of the (server) group and should not receive packets sent to the group.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%