Expressive Power of Anti-Violence Legislation

Abstract

We know more about why laws on violence against women (vaw) were adopted than about how much and in what ways these laws affect society. The authors argue that even weakly enforced laws can contribute to positive social change. They theorize the expressive power of vaw legislation, and present evidence for a cautiously optimistic assessment of current trends on violence against women and the ways that vaw laws affect social norms. Focusing on a time of major legal change related to vaw in Mexico, this article explores trends in behavior and attitudes related to violence by analyzing four waves of the National Survey on the Dynamics of Household Relations (endireh), which include detailed interviews with thousands of Mexican women. The authors find that over this period, the share of women experiencing intimate-partner abuse declined, attitudes condoning violence shifted, reporting rates rose, and most women learned about legislation to protect their rights. These changes are consistent with the authors’ expectations about the expressive power of anti-violence legislation.

Extreme Weather Expands Women’s Autonomy Where Households are Labor-Constrained: Evidence on the Impact of Droughts in Bangladesh

“…1 Finally, we construct a binary variable that equals 1 if the respondent believes that a husband is justified in beating his wife in at least one of five situations. 2 This maps intra-household gender norms (19,30). Supplementary Tables S1-S2 summarize the descriptive characteristics of our sample.…”

Effects of Mandatory Sexual Misconduct Training on University Campuses

“…Feminist analyses have long linked violence against women to unequal gender relations and traditional social norms (Htun and Weldon 2012). Considerable empirical evidence shows that gender violence is more prevalent in places where people endorse sexist beliefs, such as men’s authority over women (Cools and Kotsadam 2017; Heise and Kotsadam 2015; Htun and Jensenius 2022). Systems of inequality are sustained by cultural beliefs about group difference and the enactment of those beliefs in behaviors and institutions (Jost and Banaji 1994; Ridgeway 2011; Sewell 1992).…”

Indigenous women, multiple violences, and legal activism: Beyond the dichotomy of human rights as “law” and as “ideas for social movements”

“…For example, feminist activists have pushed states to develop progressive antiviolence laws and policies in compliance with human rights instruments (Friedman, 2009;Htun & Weldon, 2012. Importantly, there is evidence suggesting that these laws have begun to change social norms and behaviors leading to a decrease in gender violence (Htun & Jensenius, 2022). Though national gender regimes shape how international and regional instruments are ultimately institutionalized (Friedman, 2009;García-Del Moral & Neumann, 2019), these open political, legal, and discursive opportunities that feminist movements can mobilize to combat gender violence.…”