2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69937-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expressive Power and Decidability for Memory Logics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework can also be used for logics whose model theory has not been fully developed so far (e.g., Memory Logics [2,3]). In all cases, we only need to check that the requirements of the framework are met.…”
Section: Concrete Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The framework can also be used for logics whose model theory has not been fully developed so far (e.g., Memory Logics [2,3]). In all cases, we only need to check that the requirements of the framework are met.…”
Section: Concrete Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory logics, introduced in [1] and further investigated in, e.g., [2,4,3], allow modeling dynamic behavior through explicit memory operators that change the structure where evaluation takes place. Memory logics extends the syntax and semantics of BML with operators that store and retrieve elements of the domain into a memory -a subset of the domains of the model.…”
Section: Memory Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I.e., we can use the forget operator f to eliminate the current point of evaluation from the memory S, while the erase operator e completely wipes out the memory S. We have introduced this family of logics, that we called memory logics, and investigated its expressive power in [12,13,14]. The language we have just described is very flexible, and it can be used to easily characterize model properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13,14], for example, we have shown that ML( r , k ) 2 , the modal language extended with r and k , is strictly more expressive than the basic modal logic but strictly less expressive than the hybrid logic HL(↓). If we add the e operator to ML( r , k ), the resulting language is still strictly less expressive than the hybrid logic HL(↓).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%