2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-1989-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression profiling of receptor tyrosine kinases in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: a comparative analysis with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Background As the comprehensive genomic analysis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) progresses, novel treatments for this disease need to be explored. With attention to the direct connection between the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) of tumor cells and the pharmacological effects of specific inhibitors, we systematically assessed the RTK expressions of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung [HGNECs, including SCLC and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)].Patients and methodsFifty-one LCNEC an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensity and proportion of ALK expression were different between individual tumours, and all ALK IHC‐positive tumours expressed ALK in some tumour cells, in contrast to strong and uniform expression in adenocarcinoma. The characteristics were those of SCLC with ALK expression as reported previously . There were two cases of combined small‐cell carcinoma and NSCLC in our cohort, in which positive reactions were observed only in the SCLC component, and not in the NSCLC component.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intensity and proportion of ALK expression were different between individual tumours, and all ALK IHC‐positive tumours expressed ALK in some tumour cells, in contrast to strong and uniform expression in adenocarcinoma. The characteristics were those of SCLC with ALK expression as reported previously . There were two cases of combined small‐cell carcinoma and NSCLC in our cohort, in which positive reactions were observed only in the SCLC component, and not in the NSCLC component.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The characteristics were those of SCLC with ALK expression as reported previously. 20,[29][30][31][32] There were two cases of combined small-cell carcinoma and NSCLC in our cohort, in which positive reactions were observed only in the SCLC component, and not in the NSCLC component. This indicates the difference between NSCLC and SCLC in the mechanism of expression of ALK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…S7 shows the relationship between RTK overexpression and genomic alterations in 51 resected LCNECs. The protein expression data for these LCNEC tumors are from our previous report (7). In this analysis, we saw no significant correlation between strong positivity for RTK expression and genomic alterations.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Staining For Alk Rb1 and P16mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Both LCNEC and SCLC had significantly higher immunohistochemical scores for c-KIT, IGF1R and KDR, and lower scores for ERBB2, FGFR1, c-MET and ROS1 compared with lung adenocarcinomas. In addition, LCNECs and SCLCs had significantly higher scores for c-KIT, KDR and RET and lower scores for EGFR and IGF1R when compared with squamous cell carcinoma (63). The RET tyrosine kinase receptor plays a key role in neuroendocrine development and RET mutations have been long known in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) syndromes (64).…”
Section: Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of RTKs [c-KIT, insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), MET proto-oncogene; c-MET, ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) and ret proto-oncogene (RET)] was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining in a comparative study that included lung NETs, adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas (63). Of interest, no difference was noted among lung NET subtypes (LCNEC and SCLC) but significant differences in immunohistochemical score were noted between NETs and the other lung carcinomas under investigation (63). Both LCNEC and SCLC had significantly higher immunohistochemical scores for c-KIT, IGF1R and KDR, and lower scores for ERBB2, FGFR1, c-MET and ROS1 compared with lung adenocarcinomas.…”
Section: Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesmentioning
confidence: 99%