2003
DOI: 10.1186/bcr627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression pattern of CXC chemokine receptor-4 is correlated with lymph node metastasis in human invasive ductal carcinoma

Abstract: Background: The stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXC chemokine receptor-4 (SDF-1/CXCR4) signal has been shown to be important in various immunological reactions. Recent studies have suggested that CXCR4 is expressed in certain cancer cells and that they use this chemokine receptor efficiently for metastasis formation. Method:The expression of CXCR4 was evaluated by immunohistochemical study in 79 surgically resected invasive ductal carcinomas, and the relation between the staining pattern and clinicopathological … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
187
3
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(29 reference statements)
12
187
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although immunohistochemical studies in HNSCC, melanoma, and breast cancer have suggested a role for CXCR4 in lymph node metastasis, our examination found no correlation between CXCR4 expression and metastasis either in differentiating N þ from NÀ or N þ from lymph node metastasis (Robledo et al, 2001;Kato et al, 2003;Uchida et al, 2003;Delilbasi et al, 2004). Experiments in mice which inserted CXCR4 into metastatic cells resulted in an increase in hematogenous metastasis only, and blockade of CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction has a much greater inhibitory effect on hematogenous than lymphatic metastasis (Muller et al, 2001;Murakami et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Although immunohistochemical studies in HNSCC, melanoma, and breast cancer have suggested a role for CXCR4 in lymph node metastasis, our examination found no correlation between CXCR4 expression and metastasis either in differentiating N þ from NÀ or N þ from lymph node metastasis (Robledo et al, 2001;Kato et al, 2003;Uchida et al, 2003;Delilbasi et al, 2004). Experiments in mice which inserted CXCR4 into metastatic cells resulted in an increase in hematogenous metastasis only, and blockade of CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction has a much greater inhibitory effect on hematogenous than lymphatic metastasis (Muller et al, 2001;Murakami et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…A growing number of studies have confirmed that CXCR4 is expressed on the surface of a variety of tumor cells (such as salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma, breast cancer, and oral squamous carcinoma cells). It interacts with its corresponding chemokines, including CXCL12, and the molecular pair then influences the biological behavior of tumor cells (Muller et al, 2006;Kato et al, 2003;Almofti et al, 2004). We found here that, although pancreatic cancer cells do not themselves express CXCL12, they do express CXCR4 which was confirmed by immunoblotting mehhod (Grzesiak et al 2007); therefore, these cells are capable of responding to chemotactic signals from CXCL12.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Nuclear staining has also been described in breast cancer. 17 The significance of the role of CXCR4 will have to be determined in a large cohort of bladder tumor patients undergoing long-term observation for disease outcome. Only such a study will help determine the prognostic value of CXCR4 mRNA and protein expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer (Antigen Retrieval Citra; BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA) and the microwave method. 17 Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 2% normal goat serum in PBS. The TMA was incubated with mouse anti-human CXCR4 monoclonal antibody (Clone 12G5; R&D Systems) for 1 hr at room temperature at a dilution of 1:500.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%