2008
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase in the dysplasia carcinoma sequence associated with Barrett’s esophagus

Abstract: Two different studies demonstrated a-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) to be a highly specific marker in Barrett's neoplastic lesions. Reactive atypia was positive in 3/30 cases in these studies. We present a retrospective study of early Barrett's adenocarcinoma treated with surgery (2000-2005, n ¼ 29; M:F ¼ 5:1, median age 67 years). We analyzed the role of AMACR expression in reactive and neoplastic lesions associated with the disease of 77 different specimens (60 biopsy and 17 surgical specimens) of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study also found AMACR staining in 21% of samples that were originally diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia. These findings were supported by the results of a study from Scheil-Bertram et al 19 However, a recent study by Shi et al 20 showed AMACR expression at the rates of 12% in Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, 47% in indefinite for dysplasia, 44% in low-grade dysplasia, 93% in highgrade dysplasia, and 96% in adenocarcinoma, suggesting that AMACR has lower specificity for distinguishing between Barrett's esophagus with and without dysplasia. The strength of AMACR is that the test is a simple qualitative assessment of positive cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…That study also found AMACR staining in 21% of samples that were originally diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia. These findings were supported by the results of a study from Scheil-Bertram et al 19 However, a recent study by Shi et al 20 showed AMACR expression at the rates of 12% in Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, 47% in indefinite for dysplasia, 44% in low-grade dysplasia, 93% in highgrade dysplasia, and 96% in adenocarcinoma, suggesting that AMACR has lower specificity for distinguishing between Barrett's esophagus with and without dysplasia. The strength of AMACR is that the test is a simple qualitative assessment of positive cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…2 However, in some case, the identification of dysplasia can be quite challenging. Recently, several studies have explored the expression of AMACR in BE's neoplastic lesions, [5][6][7] and although in 1 study 7 AMACR was expressed in 90% of the BE-LGD, in the other 2 studies, lower percentages of AMACRpositive cases were identified: 37.5% and 10.5%, respectively. 5,6 Furthermore, collectively, these previous FIGURE 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…5 In the series of Xu et al, 12 8/17 (47.1%) cases of BE-IND were AMACR positive, but again, only weakly (1+). In the larger group of BE-IND studied so far by immunostaining for AMACR, 7 8/ 30 (26.7%) showed AMACR positivity, but all with a weak staining pattern. In our study, as in that of Lisovsky et al, 6 none of the 10 and 16 cases, respectively, was positive for AMACR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations