2007
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20061982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of the transcription factor cKrox in peripheral CD8 T cells reveals substantial postthymic plasticity in CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation

Abstract: Most T cells belong to either of two lineages defined by the mutually exclusive expression of CD4 and CD8 coreceptors: CD4 T cells are major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II restricted and have helper function, whereas CD8 T cells are MHC I restricted and have cytotoxic function. The divergence between these two lineages occurs during intrathymic selection and is thought to be irreversible in mature T cells. It is, however, unclear whether the CD4-CD8 differentiation of postthymic T cells retains some level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cessation of CD8 and the maintenance of CD4 coreceptor expression are two key events characteristic of CD4 cell differentiation. That Zbtb7b belongs to a family of proteins that generally act as transcriptional repressors (34,35) is in line with it repressing CD8 expression by targeting CD8 cis-regulatory elements, as we recently showed of the CD8 E8(I) enhancer (28,36,37). In contrast to its effect on CD8, the ability of Zbtb7b to promote CD4 expression obviously does not fit with a direct transcriptional repression effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The cessation of CD8 and the maintenance of CD4 coreceptor expression are two key events characteristic of CD4 cell differentiation. That Zbtb7b belongs to a family of proteins that generally act as transcriptional repressors (34,35) is in line with it repressing CD8 expression by targeting CD8 cis-regulatory elements, as we recently showed of the CD8 E8(I) enhancer (28,36,37). In contrast to its effect on CD8, the ability of Zbtb7b to promote CD4 expression obviously does not fit with a direct transcriptional repression effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several transcription factors have been implicated in the control of CD8␣ gene expression, including STAT5 and STAT6 for which a putative binding site has been identified within the CD8 enhancer element E8 I (7), MAZR which binds enhancer E8 II and negatively regulates CD8 expression (31), cKrox which binds E8 I and negatively regulates both CD8 and IFN-␥ expression while up-regulating GATA-3 (32), and GATA-3 for which binding sites have been identified in both mouse and human CD8 enhancer regions (33,34). Two observations suggest that GATA-3 may have a role as a negative regulator: first, in the thymus, GATA-3 promotes CD4 lineage development while inhibiting CD8 lineage development (35); second, GATA-3 expression is induced in CD8 ϩ T cells exposed to IL-4 (36) or transduced with cKrox which, as noted above, down-regulates CD8 expression (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, thymocytes that are deficient in both ThPOK and RUNX3 are committed by default to the CD4 lineage (14), suggesting that ThPOK antagonizes RUNX3-mediated CD8 lineage choices in the process of CD4/CD8 lineage commitment. Indeed, the overexpression of ThPOK represses cytotoxic gene expression in CD4 (15) or mature CD8 T cells (16). However, it is still unknown whether ThPOK is responsible for CD8 silencing in the commitment of the CD4 lineage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%