2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of the c-kit receptor characterizes a subset of neuroblastomas with favorable prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…42) On the contrary, another report stated that cKit positive NBs have favorable prognoses based on the same immunohistochemical method. 43) Based on our findings, although the SCF mRNA expression had no prognostic value for our NB patients, surviving NB patients had high expression of c-kit mRNA compared with little or no c-kit expression in the NB patients who subsequently died. It is possible that NB tumor cells with c-kit expression-positive NB tumor cells can react with SCF (by autocrine or paracrine system), but tumor cells with no such expression can not react, and these tumors continue to be immature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42) On the contrary, another report stated that cKit positive NBs have favorable prognoses based on the same immunohistochemical method. 43) Based on our findings, although the SCF mRNA expression had no prognostic value for our NB patients, surviving NB patients had high expression of c-kit mRNA compared with little or no c-kit expression in the NB patients who subsequently died. It is possible that NB tumor cells with c-kit expression-positive NB tumor cells can react with SCF (by autocrine or paracrine system), but tumor cells with no such expression can not react, and these tumors continue to be immature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival analyses for the c-kit expression have been demonstrated in several malignant tumours (Tonary et al, 2000;Bar-Sela et al, 2003;Scobie et al, 2003;Krams et al, 2004;Simon et al, 2004;Pan et al, 2005), while there was only one survival analysis (Simon et al, 2004) regarding breast cancer, in which no difference was found in the survival between the patients with or without the c-kit expression. Although no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes has been found in endometrial adenocarcinomas (Scobie et al, 2003), nasopharygeal carcinomas (Bar-Sela et al, 2003) and small cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder (Pan et al, 2005), two studies on ovarian cancers (Tonary et al, 2000) and neuroblastomas (Krams et al, 2004) indicated an association between a loss of the c-kit expression and poor prognosis. In ovarian cancers, the loss of c-kit expression was associated with a poor prognosis, while the c-kit expression tended to decrease at an advanced stage (Tonary et al, 2000), being similar with our findings in breast cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ovarian cancers, the loss of c-kit expression was associated with a poor prognosis, while the c-kit expression tended to decrease at an advanced stage (Tonary et al, 2000), being similar with our findings in breast cancers. On the other hand, the prognostic value of the c-kit expression was demonstrated based on multivariate analyses for nueroblastomas (Krams et al, 2004). In the present study, a univariate analysis demonstrated the prognosis of the patients with a loss of the c-kit expression to be significantly worse than those with a positive c-kit expression, while a multivariate analysis demonstrated lymph node metastasis and a proliferative activity determined by MIB-1 counts, but not the c-kit expression, to be independently significant prognostic factors for DFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in other tumors (57,58), the clinical impact of deregulated expression of this ligand/receptor system in CRC remains, at least in part, controversial. As a matter of fact, when KIT or SCF protein expression was analyzed separately, no significant association was found between either patient survival or disease recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%