1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1656(98)00070-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of recombinant human acid sphingomyelinase in insect Sf21 cells: purification, processing and enzymatic characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identity of Mature L-SMase-Acid SMase has been purified from a variety of different sources including human urine (27)(28)(29), human brain (30), human placenta (7,31,32), overexpression in CHO cells (33), and Sf21 insect cells (34). Importantly, aSMase purified from extracellular sources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identity of Mature L-SMase-Acid SMase has been purified from a variety of different sources including human urine (27)(28)(29), human brain (30), human placenta (7,31,32), overexpression in CHO cells (33), and Sf21 insect cells (34). Importantly, aSMase purified from extracellular sources (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the overexpression of heterologous Sf hex results in a significantly higher fraction of secreted protein compared with endogenous ratios. If the intracellular sorting machinery is saturated, then the fraction of a protein that is secreted will increase, a situation that is amplified when proteins such as those targeted to the lysosome are overexpressed in insect cells using cDNA constructs such as human HexB (52), human GM2 (GalNAc␤1,4(NeuAc␣2,3)Gal␤1,4Glc␤1,1Ј-ceramide) activator protein (53), and human sphingomyelinase (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, deglycosylation treatment or expression of a dominant-negative sortilin variant results in trapping of the enzyme within the Golgi in its degradation-vulnerable form (Bartelsen et al, 1998;He et al, 1999;Ni and Morales, 2006).…”
Section: Unauthenticatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MichaelisMenten kinetic analysis revealed roughly similar values of the Michaelis constant K m for SM affinity despite the use of differently labeled substrates: 77 μm for soluble ASM in the human epidermis (Bowser and Gray, 1978), 5-25 μm for ASM purified from placenta (Jones et al, 1981Sakuragawa, 1982), 65 μm for ASM from Bacillus cereus (Fujii et al, 2004), 47 μm for ASM from human fibroblasts (Sato et al, 1988), 25 μm for recombinant ASM from the conditioned medium of infected insect cells (Bartelsen et al, 1998), 20 μm for ASM from human CSF , 0.2-0.6 μm for ASM released from human fibroblasts and mouse L-cells, respectively (Weitz et al, 1983), 11 μm with a V MAX of 21 nmol/h/mg protein for HEK 293 whole cell lysates and 2 μm and a V MAX of 4.3 μmol/h/mg protein for ASM immunoprecipitated from Jurkat cells (Gulbins and Kolesnick, 2000). Specific activities ranged from 600 to 2500 μmol/h/mg (Sakuragawa, 1982;Yamanaka and Suzuki, 1982;Jones et al, 1983;Weitz et al, 1985;Lansmann et al, 1996).…”
Section: Enzyme Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%