2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of progesterone receptor is a favorable prognostic marker in ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

19
131
3
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
19
131
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency could relate to tumor histology because in our study, ERa expression was significantly higher in serous than in nonserous tumors. This difference was also observed by Lee et al, who found that 85% of serous tumors had ERa expression compared with 54% of nonserous tumors in a group of 269 ovarian tumor samples (49). Fujimura et al also reported that ERa expression was absent in clear cell tumors, but was present in serous, endometrioid, and mucinous cells of ovarian cancer (50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This inconsistency could relate to tumor histology because in our study, ERa expression was significantly higher in serous than in nonserous tumors. This difference was also observed by Lee et al, who found that 85% of serous tumors had ERa expression compared with 54% of nonserous tumors in a group of 269 ovarian tumor samples (49). Fujimura et al also reported that ERa expression was absent in clear cell tumors, but was present in serous, endometrioid, and mucinous cells of ovarian cancer (50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, concerning the prognostic role the results were discordant. Several groups report a prognostic effect of progesterone receptor, but not of ER (Kommoss et al 1992, MĂŒnstedt et al 2000, Hornung et al 2004, Lee et al 2005. Some groups reported a positive prognostic effect of ER expression measured by immunohistochemistry (Isola et al 1990, HĂžgdall et al 2007, while other studies did not find any prognostic effect (Scambia et al 1995, Lu et al 2006.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential increased risk of mucinous and serous tumours in women with twin girls, and an increased risk of endometrioid tumours in women with girls only, may thus be related to an adverse effect of oestrogens, acting either at early or later stages of carcinogenesis during pregnancy. Oestrogen receptors have been found both in endometrioid, serous and mucinous ovarian tumours (Risch, 1998;Gadducci et al, 2004;Auranen et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2005), and also in normal ovarian surface epithelial cells (Cunat et al, 2004;Auranen et al, 2005). The apparent reduced risk of endometrioid tumours in twin mothers, however, is more likely explained by other, possibly maternal factors (Risch, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%