1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb02458.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of MAGE‐1 Gene by Esophageal Carcinomas

Abstract: Expression of the MAGE genes encoding tumor‐rejection antigens on HLA‐A1 and ‐Cwl601 recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes was investigated in esophageal carcinomas at the mRNA level by the semiquantitative reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction method. MAGE‐1 and ‐2 genes, but not MAGE‐3, ‐3/‐6 and ‐4a/‐4b genes, were expressed in substantial proportions of the primary esophageal carcinomas and their metastatic lymph nodes. The proportion of MAGE‐positive samples in the primary esophageal carcinomas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This high expression frequency and the associated strong immununoreactivity can be explained by the use of a poly‐MAGE antibody detecting 7 members of the MAGE‐A family. Previous studies have shown that at least 1 member of the MAGE‐A gene family is expressed in 34 to 84%7, 13, 14, 15, 16 of the examined esophageal tumors. In most of the studies, including ours, MAGE‐A protein expression rate is lower than MAGE‐A mRNA expression rate 9, 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This high expression frequency and the associated strong immununoreactivity can be explained by the use of a poly‐MAGE antibody detecting 7 members of the MAGE‐A family. Previous studies have shown that at least 1 member of the MAGE‐A gene family is expressed in 34 to 84%7, 13, 14, 15, 16 of the examined esophageal tumors. In most of the studies, including ours, MAGE‐A protein expression rate is lower than MAGE‐A mRNA expression rate 9, 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In malignant melanoma, MAGE protein expression analyzed immunohistochemically with mAb 57B has been shown to correlate only with lymphocytic infiltrates, while no correlation was found with any other prognostic parameter. 47 On an mRNA level, correlation between CT antigen expression and tumor stage has been reported in several tumors such as renal cell carcinoma, 48 bladder 49 and esophageal carcinoma, 50 and melanoma. 51 This association has not been demonstrated in others: head and neck carcinoma, 52 seminoma 18 stomach, 53 or colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we showed that higher levels of MAGE-A4 expression correlated with advanced tumor stage, which is consistent with previous reports. [36][37][38][39] The exact mechanism by which expression of MAGE-A4 and other CTAs results in poor clinical outcome is not well described. 40 The precise role that CT antigens might play in cancer cell biology has yet remained to be clarified.…”
Section: ©2 0 1 1 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%