2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00392.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of Invasiveness of Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni after Serial Intraperitoneal Passages in Mice

Abstract: We investigated the possibility of inducing the expression of invasiveness in 10 non-invading, laboratory-adapted Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni strains, after serial intraperitoneal (i.p.) passage in mice. All the strains expressed invasive capacity after the first passage, with an increase in invasion rates and the number of internalized bacteria after each passage. These results suggest that i.p. passage enhances the expression of invasiveness in C. jejuni ssp. jejuni strains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both overall invasion efficiency and isolate‐specific variation in invasiveness of C. upsaliensis observed in this study was not untypical of that reported for other enteric campylobacters, including C. jejuni and Campylobacter coli (Konkel et al ., 1992; Schwartz et al ., 1996; Tay et al ., 1996; Biswas et al ., 2000; Fernandez et al ., 2000). It is noteworthy that the ATCC type strain, ATCC43954, showed lower invasiveness on any of the cell lines used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both overall invasion efficiency and isolate‐specific variation in invasiveness of C. upsaliensis observed in this study was not untypical of that reported for other enteric campylobacters, including C. jejuni and Campylobacter coli (Konkel et al ., 1992; Schwartz et al ., 1996; Tay et al ., 1996; Biswas et al ., 2000; Fernandez et al ., 2000). It is noteworthy that the ATCC type strain, ATCC43954, showed lower invasiveness on any of the cell lines used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the ATCC type strain, ATCC43954, showed lower invasiveness on any of the cell lines used in this study. That the two clinical isolates were more invasive than ATCC43954 may reflect the extensive in vitro passaging and prolonged storage of the type strain (Konkel et al ., 1990; Babakhani and Joens, 1993; Fernandez et al ., 2000). Although ATCC43954 is the best characterized isolate of C. upsaliensis , it is not typical of other members of this species in a number of ways, other than the degree of invasiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter class of proteins is described in pathogenic Corynebacterium species and may contribute especially in the process of cellular adhesion [48]. In Campylobacter jejuni, serial passages in mice induce the expression of invasiveness and increase the capacity of cell invasion [13]. Components of the Opp system were induced by the passage process, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results from an evaluation of the virulence potential of Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) were also observed when mice were infected with a lower dose of the recovered bacteria that had been recovered after serial passage in a murine model (Fernandez-Brando et al, 2012). Other studies have also shown that the serial passage process through in vitro or in vivo models leads to changes in the virulence potential of pathogens, including Helicobacter pylori, Escherichia coli, Xenorhabdus nematophila, Arcobacter butzleri, Salmonella enterica , and Shigella flexneri (Fernández et al, 2000, 2013; Bleich et al, 2005; Chapuis et al, 2011; Fernandez-Brando et al, 2012; Liu et al, 2015). Changes in the virulence potential of these pathogens, as well as in 258_ equi , show that this strategy promotes the activation of genes related to bacterial pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several studies have used mice as a model for studying both the pathogenic process (Jolly, 1965; Zaki, 1966; Nieto et al, 2009) and vaccination testing against infection by C. pseudotuberculosis (Simmons et al, 1997; Lan et al, 1999; Gorman et al, 2010; Ribeiro et al, 2014; Droppa-Almeida et al, 2016). In regards to host-bacteria interactions, some work has explored the serial passage process of bacterial pathogens in vitro or in an in vivo model to identify factors that might be involved in virulence (Fernández et al, 2000, 2013; Bleich et al, 2005; Chapuis et al, 2011; Fernandez-Brando et al, 2012; Liu et al, 2015). In this study, we adopted an in vivo assay in which the strain 258_ equi was experimentally inoculated in mice followed by high-throughput proteomic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%