2019
DOI: 10.1121/1.5100612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters

Abstract: Emotion expression plays a crucial role for regulating social interactions. One efficient channel for emotion communication is the vocal-auditory channel, which enables a fast transmission of information. Filter-related parameters (formants) have been suggested as a key to the vocal differentiation of emotional valence (positive versus negative) across species, but variation in relation to emotions has rarely been investigated. Here, whether pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) closed-mouth grunts differ in source- and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
46
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
6
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the arrival of the partner was delayed, the duration of grunts increased for both partner. Longer grunts had already been associated to negative emotional valence 18,19,28 , which confirms that the delay lead in piglets to a negative emotional state, a situation of non-correspondence with expectation, whatever the partner. These results allow us to conclude that we did succeed in generating a specific anticipatory state during the tests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the arrival of the partner was delayed, the duration of grunts increased for both partner. Longer grunts had already been associated to negative emotional valence 18,19,28 , which confirms that the delay lead in piglets to a negative emotional state, a situation of non-correspondence with expectation, whatever the partner. These results allow us to conclude that we did succeed in generating a specific anticipatory state during the tests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This latter phase is certainly a context with a negative valence (social isolation) and piglets may express the negative valence of this context in the duration of their grunt. In fact, several examples of the literature show that grunt duration is higher in negative contexts 18,28 . The duration of piglets’ grunt was not changed during anticipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the arrival of the partner was delayed, the duration of the piglets’ grunts increased for both partner types. Longer grunts had already been associated with a negative emotional valence 19 , 20 , 35 , which confirms that delaying the arrival of the partner led to a negative emotional state in comparison to the initial phase: a discrepancy from expectation that produced something like frustration. These results allow us to conclude that we did succeed in generating a specific anticipatory state during the tests which was expressed both behaviourally and vocally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Thus, the quality of vocalisations could be a good indicator to evaluate anticipation in piglets. This might be even more relevant with the quality of grunts, which are expressed in negative and positive situations, and show a large variability in their acoustic properties 17 , 35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefer et al 2019). However, it is not known if the vocal indicators revealed in previous studies are 32 valid across call types and contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%