2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 is related to lymphatic metastasis and indicates prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients after surgery resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All four datasets showed consistent results, indicating that CKAP4 mRNA levels were significantly higher in tumor tissues compared with adjacent liver tissues. These results confirm the upregulation of CKAP4 in tumor tissues in accordance with previous results found in HCC (19) and other types of cancer, including cervical cancer, bladder cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, ESCC, CLL, PDAC and intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…All four datasets showed consistent results, indicating that CKAP4 mRNA levels were significantly higher in tumor tissues compared with adjacent liver tissues. These results confirm the upregulation of CKAP4 in tumor tissues in accordance with previous results found in HCC (19) and other types of cancer, including cervical cancer, bladder cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, ESCC, CLL, PDAC and intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It was reported that CKAP4 plays important roles in several cellular processes, including endoplasmic reticulum anchoring 18 and morphology determination 19, regulation of Dicer function 20, cell proliferation 21 and tumour migration 22, 23. Knockdown of CKAP4 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stained sections were evaluated in a blinded manner without prior knowledge of the clinical data using the German immunoreactive score (IRS), as described previously [ 20 , 21 ]. Briefly, staining intensity was graded as “0” (negative), “1” (weak), “2” (moderate) and “3” (strong); staining extent was graded as “0” (<5%), “1” (5-25%), “2” (25-50%), “3” (50-75%) and “4” (>75%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%