2010
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00762-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of a Bacillus Phytase C Gene in Pichia pastoris and Properties of the Recombinant Enzyme

Abstract: The cloning and expression of a native gene encoding a Bacillus subtilis phytase using Pichia pastoris as the host is described. In addition, the influence of N-glycosylation on the biochemical properties of the B. subtilis phytase, the influence of pH on the thermostability of the recombinant and native B. subtilis phytases, and the resistance of both phytases to shrimp digestive enzymes and porcine trypsin are also described. After 48 h of methanol induction in shake flasks, a selected recombinant strain pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A to C). Similar results have been reported with the P. pastoris-produced N-glycosylated Bacillus subtilis phytase that shows resistance to trypsin but not pepsin (41). In contrast, the N-glycosylated phytases derived from Aspergillus japonicus BCC18313, A. niger BCC18081, Eupenicillium parvum BCC17694, and Neosartorya spinosa BCC41923 are resistant to pepsin but not to trypsin (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3A to C). Similar results have been reported with the P. pastoris-produced N-glycosylated Bacillus subtilis phytase that shows resistance to trypsin but not pepsin (41). In contrast, the N-glycosylated phytases derived from Aspergillus japonicus BCC18313, A. niger BCC18081, Eupenicillium parvum BCC17694, and Neosartorya spinosa BCC41923 are resistant to pepsin but not to trypsin (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Two main strategies have been applied to improve the protease resistance of feed enzymes. One is to explore protease-resistant feed enzymes (41,42), and the other is to screen engineered feed enzymes with improved protease resistance by rational design (43). Structure-based rational design has been less frequently used than naturally occurring protease-resistant enzymes (24,(44)(45)(46), especially with respect to pepsin resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect on thermostability was most probably due to posttranslational modifications, such as N-glycosylation, which is present in extracellular proteins produced in Sulfolobus (17), and so it appeared for SSO1354, whereas the polypeptide produced in E. coli is surely not glycosylated. In general, the contribution of glycosylation in increasing the resistance of proteins to extreme conditions is well documented (8,28,30,33,34,44). Archeal N-linked glycans are structurally simple, being composed of 3 to 5 sugar residues that are preferentially unbranched.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of using P. pastoris-preferred codons in fteII and fba was evaluated by comparing the expression levels of each overproducer strain with the expression levels under the same culture conditions for P. pastoris strains GS115 Mut ϩ (GS115PhyC) and KM71 Mut s (KM71PhyC), which are overproducers of recombinant Bacillus subtilis phytase C (PhyC-R), previously constructed in our laboratory (12,13). In addition, the influence of an F (FTEII) or K (FBA) residue at position P1Ј of the Kex2 site for the ␣-mating factor prepro-secretion signal processing was evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%