One challenge for plant biology has been to identify floral stimuli at the shoot apex. Using sensitive and specific gas chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques, we have followed changes in gibberellins (GAs) at the shoot apex during long day (LD)-regulated induction of flowering in the grass Lolium temulentum. Two separate roles of GAs in flowering are indicated. First, within 8 h of an inductive LD, i.e. at the time of floral evocation, the GA 5 content of the shoot apex doubled to about 120 ng g Ϫ1 dry weight. The concentration of applied GA 5 required for floral induction of excised apices (R.W. King, C. Blundell, L.T. Evans [1993] Aust J Plant Physiol 20: 337-348) was similar to that in the shoot apex. Leaf-applied [ 2 H 4 ] GA 5 was transported intact from the leaf to the shoot apex, flowering being proportional to the amount of GA 5 imported. Thus, GA 5 could be part of the LD stimulus for floral evocation of L. temulentum or, alternatively, its increase at the shoot apex could follow import of a primary floral stimulus. Later, during inflorescence differentiation and especially after exposure to additional LD, a second GA action was apparent. The content of GA 1 and GA 4 in the apex increased greatly, whereas GA 5 decreased by up to 75%. GA 4 applied during inflorescence differentiation strongly promoted flowering and stem elongation, whereas it was ineffective for earlier floral evocation although it caused stem growth at all times of application. Thus, we conclude that GA 1 and GA 4 are secondary, late-acting LD stimuli for inflorescence differentiation in L. temulentum.Plants of Lolium temulentum remain vegetative when grown in short days (SD), but flower after exposure of their leaves to a single long day (LD). The leaf gibberellin (GA) content increases in LD (Gocal et al., 1999) and applied GAs can cause flowering in noninductive SD (Evans, 1964;Pharis et al., 1987;Evans et al., 1990). Thus, GAs mimic LD responses and they could be a transmissible endogenous floral stimulus in this LD plant. A number of other LD plants but not all (for summary, see Metzger, 1995) flower in response to GA, and recent genetic and molecular studies with Arabidopsis support such a role for endogenous GAs in flowering in LD (Wilson et al., 1992;Weigel and Nilsson, 1995;Blásquez et al., 1997). Furthermore, where there are effects of LD exposure on stem elongation there are clear increases in the GA content of leaves, petioles, and shoot tips (Talon and Zeevaart, 1990;Talon et al., 1991;Zeevaart et al., 1993).Inflorescence initiation in L. temulentum after one LD precedes any acceleration of stem elongation. Therefore, if GAs were to play a role endogenously in floral evocation, they should have little effect on stem elongation. From application studies, we previously identified a number of GAs, including GA 5 , that meet this criterion of inducing flowering but with little or no effect on stem elongation (Evans et al., 1990(Evans et al., , 1994a(Evans et al., , 1994b. However, in a broad context, three lines of evi...