2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-013-1266-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression analysis of dehydrin multigene family across tolerant and susceptible barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in response to terminal drought stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the increase of their expression under different drought regimes, two dehydrins genes, HvDHN1 and HvDHN9, were chosen (Choi et al 1999;Suprunova et al 2004;Karami et al 2013). These genes showed increased expression under drought stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the increase of their expression under different drought regimes, two dehydrins genes, HvDHN1 and HvDHN9, were chosen (Choi et al 1999;Suprunova et al 2004;Karami et al 2013). These genes showed increased expression under drought stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three cultivars were treated with different concentrations (0,5,10,15,20,25, and 30%) of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) at the three-leaf stage in an incubator at 25 o C with 2000 lx lighting intensity and a 14h:10h light:dark photoperiod. Sufficient PEG 6000 solution was added to each dish every day so that simulated drought conditions could be maintained for 3 d. Then the relative conductivity and malondialdehyde content of leaves were measured according to Karami et al (2013), while the soluble protein content of leaves was determined according to Bradford (1976).…”
Section: Polyethylene Glycol 6000 Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding is accordance with those of Kumar and Sharma, (2010) and Sharma et al (2016) observed reduction in relative water content when crop was imposed under drought environment. Karami et al 2013 find genotype whose maintain water status had more in antioxidant activity under drought condition. Behbahanizadeh, et al (2014) and Ram et al (2017) also reported that under drought stress conditions (moderate stress and severe stress) RWC, osmotic potential and water potential reduced in contrast to control condition and cultivars had a significant difference together in water relation traits.…”
Section: Relative Water Content (%)mentioning
confidence: 87%