2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposures in interventional radiology using Monte Carlo simulation coupled with virtual anthropomorphic phantoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, estimation of patient dose through DCCs is not straightforward, as DCCs are usually only derived for a limited number of specific procedures. Differences in clinical setting such as beam angle, projection view, FOV, beam quality, exposure parameters, the use of filtration, etc., can lead to discrepancies in DCCs which could subsequently cause a high percentage of error in dose estimation [81,102]. Other factors such as disagreement on patient-phantom matching and beam alignment as mentioned in Sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 are also present and contribute to high relative error, as DCCs are sensitive to anthropometric changes especially the subcutaneous fats located superficial to major target organs [77,99].…”
Section: Dose Conversion Coefficients (Dccs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, estimation of patient dose through DCCs is not straightforward, as DCCs are usually only derived for a limited number of specific procedures. Differences in clinical setting such as beam angle, projection view, FOV, beam quality, exposure parameters, the use of filtration, etc., can lead to discrepancies in DCCs which could subsequently cause a high percentage of error in dose estimation [81,102]. Other factors such as disagreement on patient-phantom matching and beam alignment as mentioned in Sections 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 are also present and contribute to high relative error, as DCCs are sensitive to anthropometric changes especially the subcutaneous fats located superficial to major target organs [77,99].…”
Section: Dose Conversion Coefficients (Dccs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous patients have greatly benefited from cardiac interventional radiology (IR), radiation-induced skin injuries have been reported in several cardiac IR procedures [112]. These deterministic effects arise because these complicated procedures tend to require an extended fluoroscopic exposure time and repeated digital angiography (DA) with various angles of X-ray projection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of interventional radiology occupational exposures has also been made using the Monte Carlo (MC) technique [12] [13] [14]. This said, the stray radiation 3D distribution has not been previously obtained via MC simulation using the high definition reference Korean-man (HDRK-man) virtual anthropomorphic phantom [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%