2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to Political Disparagement Humor and Its Impact on Trust in Politicians: How Long Does It Last?

Abstract: The experimental research that looks into the effects of political humor on an individual’s attitudes toward politics and politicians does not evaluate its long-term effects. With this in mind, this study aims to determine the possible effects that being exposed to humor which belittles politicians may have on an ordinary citizen’s trust in them, while at the same time it observes the possible effects that such exposure has on them and the time such effects last. Two hypotheses were tested. The first one was t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important caveat for these audience-characteristics effects lies in the fact that a large majority of studies was conducted in the United States (RQ1b). The few studies from other areas of the world come from a wide range of countries in Europe (e.g., Boukes et al, 2015), Asia (e.g., Chen et al, 2017), and South America (e.g., Mendiburo-Seguel et al, 2017). US satire is highly partisan (Young, 2019), but satire in other countries may be more ambiguous (Brugman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important caveat for these audience-characteristics effects lies in the fact that a large majority of studies was conducted in the United States (RQ1b). The few studies from other areas of the world come from a wide range of countries in Europe (e.g., Boukes et al, 2015), Asia (e.g., Chen et al, 2017), and South America (e.g., Mendiburo-Seguel et al, 2017). US satire is highly partisan (Young, 2019), but satire in other countries may be more ambiguous (Brugman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferred from Uwanamodo's (2019) argument, this becomes possible as comedy categorizes people with similar experiences into a group while the disparaged entity automatically falls into the other group thereby creating a "we" and "them" situation. People construct their social identity, morale, and cohesion through the comparison and positive distinctiveness of the groups they belong to; in-groups, with the out-groups to 'sustain the morale and cohesion of groups (Mendiburo-Seguel et al, 2017;Tavory, 2014;Fine, 1984). DH can, therefore, be used as a way to obtain a separate positive identity, especially when the out-group has been linked with some negativity.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than being bewildered by social problems, Nigerians could turn them into entertainment. According to Mendiburo-Seguel, Vargas, & Rubio (2017), comedy could be grouped into two types; political and non-political. Although Nigerians joke about different social issues, one major theme in the country's comedy has to do with disparaging Nigerian politics, government, and its various consequences (Afolayan, 2013;Obadare, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could explain the unperturbed attitude of Nigerians to the revolutionary music, 'Shuffering and Shmiling', as submitted by Eesuola (2015). This principle can also be applied to the political terrain, considering that when a political administration is disparaged, the administered will be in a good disposition to accept the negative descriptions attributed to such polity (Mendiburo-Seguel, Vargas, & Rubio, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%