2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to metal nanoparticles changes zeta potentials of Rhodococcus cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zeta potentials for the V-2 and C@V samples are −13.15, and −13.91 mV, respectively. Since the C@V in particular has a lower value of the zeta potential in comparison to the V-2 sample, which makes it more stable as revealed in Table …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zeta potentials for the V-2 and C@V samples are −13.15, and −13.91 mV, respectively. Since the C@V in particular has a lower value of the zeta potential in comparison to the V-2 sample, which makes it more stable as revealed in Table …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the C@V in particular has a lower value of the zeta potential in comparison to the V-2 sample, which makes it more stable as revealed in Table 3. 47…”
Section: % Of Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential method of action includes membrane function; metallic nanoparticles have a positively charged surface that allows them to interact with negatively charged bacterium membranes, enabling them to attach to various cell structures and leading to chemical interaction. The electrostatic interaction occurs between positively charged metallic nanoparticles and negatively charged bacteria on the surface and charged in cell morphology, leading to growth inhibition …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Another potential method of action includes membrane function; metallic nanoparticles have a positively charged surface that allows them to interact with negatively charged bacterium membranes, enabling them to attach to various cell structures and leading to chemical interaction. The electrostatic interaction occurs between positively charged metallic nanoparticles and negatively charged bacteria on the surface and charged in cell morphology, leading to growth inhibition ROS are a species of oxygen that can damage the cell membrane, DNA, and cellular protein, which leads to cell death. , ROS are produced when oxygen enters undersized reduction states, which may be attributed to the formation of oxidative stress by the superoxide anion (O 2 •– ), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), and the hydroxide radical (OH • ), which leads to the formation of H 2 O 2 and further damages the DNA as well as proteins in bacteria. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal NPs and their oxides are broadly used in various applications, such as electronics, optics, information technologies, and batteries, because of their large specific surface area, adsorption activity, and high catalytic activity. 14 Additionally, they are extensively used in biomedicine and environmental applications due to their favorable optical, chemical, mechanical, electrical, and magnetic characteristics. [15][16][17][18] These NPs can be produced using a variety of physical, chemical, and biological methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%