“…These features have led biomedical fields to turn to DNAm‐based biomarkers to gain insight into biological ageing (Horvath, 2013 ; Horvath & Raj, 2018 ), contaminant exposure (Cardenas et al, 2017 ; Green et al, 2016 ; Gruzieva et al, 2017 ; Joubert et al, 2016 ), and the developmental origins of adult health and disease (Felix & Cecil, 2019 ; Heijmans et al, 2008 ). More recently, the ecological sciences have followed suit, harnessing the potential of the DNA methylome to understand life‐history variation (Anderson et al, 2021 ; Cayuela et al, 2021 ; de Paoli‐Iseppi et al, 2017 ; Lindner et al, 2021 ; Parrott & Bertucci, 2019 ), organismal health (Crossman et al, 2021 ; Hu et al, 2018 ; Lea et al, 2016 ), exposure to environmental stressors (Bertucci et al, 2021 ; Guillette et al, 2016 ; Liew et al, 2018 ; Mäkinen et al, 2022 ; Parrott, Bowden, et al, 2014 ) and developmental plasticity (Laubach et al, 2019 ; Navarro‐Martín et al, 2011 ; Parrott, Kohno, et al, 2014 ; von Holdt et al, 2021 ). Collectively, these studies indicate that DNAm patterns at discrete loci in nonlethally sampled tissues (e.g., blood) provide insight into fundamental aspects of an individual’s biology, health status and past environmental experience that would otherwise be nearly impossible to measure.…”