2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-018-1322-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to field vs. storage wheat dust: different consequences on respiratory symptoms and immune response among grain workers

Abstract: The clinical picture of workers exposed to field or storage wheat dust differed. The systematic characterization of the aerosol microbial profile may help to understand the reasons for those differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence in larger quantities of some Cryptococcus species in grain workers’ environment than in cattle raisers’ one, can also make a difference in the clinical picture of those workers. Indeed, a distinct immune response against Cryptococcus of grain workers and cattle raisers has previously been described [1]. However, too few data are available to estimate the importance of exposure to different Cryptococcus species and the development of respiratory pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The presence in larger quantities of some Cryptococcus species in grain workers’ environment than in cattle raisers’ one, can also make a difference in the clinical picture of those workers. Indeed, a distinct immune response against Cryptococcus of grain workers and cattle raisers has previously been described [1]. However, too few data are available to estimate the importance of exposure to different Cryptococcus species and the development of respiratory pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A longitudinal study was conducted on workers occupationally exposed to wheat dust (terminal elevator operators, harvesters, grain farmers and cattle raisers) and workers not occupationally exposed to it. The inclusion of the 142 participants to the overall protocol, the assessment of their exposure to bioaerosols, in particular to those associated to wheat dust, as well as the consequences of this exposure on respiratory symptoms and immune response, have been described in detail elsewhere [1,2]. Briefly, all participants were visited twice, at a six month interval, between August 2012 and June 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations