2020
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to dipeptidyl‐peptidase 4 inhibitors and the risk of pneumonia among people with type 2 diabetes: Retrospective cohort study and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Aim Concerns have been raised that dipeptidyl‐peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP‐4i) may increase the risk of pneumonia. We analysed observational data and clinical trials to explore whether use of DPP‐4i modifies the risk of pneumonia. Methods We identified patients with diabetes in the Veneto region administrative database and performed propensity score matching between new users of DPP‐4 inhibitors and new users of other oral glucose‐lowering medications (OGLMs). We compared the rate of hospitalization for pneumon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Second, it is also possible that the observed protective association is the result of an increased risk of pneumonia with DPP-4i. However, although there may be a biological mechanism linking DPP-4i to an increased risk of infections, [35][36][37] most previous studies of the pneumonia risk of DPP-4i did not identify an increased risk, [21][22][23][24][25]38 suggesting that this is an unlikely explanation for the observed association. Third, the observed association may be the result of residual confounding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…34 Second, it is also possible that the observed protective association is the result of an increased risk of pneumonia with DPP-4i. However, although there may be a biological mechanism linking DPP-4i to an increased risk of infections, [35][36][37] most previous studies of the pneumonia risk of DPP-4i did not identify an increased risk, [21][22][23][24][25]38 suggesting that this is an unlikely explanation for the observed association. Third, the observed association may be the result of residual confounding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Using DPP4is as a comparator also avoided time-lagging bias (28) and allowed a clinically relevant comparison since both SGLT2is and DPP4is are used as second-or thirdline anti-diabetic treatment. There was also no significant association between DPP4is and pneumonia risk as reported in a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials (11). Third, a PS calculated from 67 covariates, which covered a wide range of clinically relevant conditions, would greatly reduce potential confounding.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…DPP4is were chosen as a comparator because both SGLT2is and DPP4is were commonly used as second-or third-line anti-diabetic agents in Hong Kong, thus avoiding confounding by indication. In addition, a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials showed no association between DPP4is and the risk of pneumonia (11). Exclusion criteria were: 1) patients with the use of SGLT2is before index date for the DPP4i control group; 2) patients with DPP4i and SGLT2i initiated on the same date; 3) patients of type 1 diabetes (T1D); 4) patients with prescription records of index drugs for only 1 day; 5) patients who received dialysis or renal transplant within 1 year before index date; and 6) patients with no laboratory measurements of HbA1c or eGFR within 1 year before index date (Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In people with diabetes, prior studies suggested a lack of an association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and the occurrence of community-acquired pneumopathy from any cause, 12,24 but also specifically because of SARS-CoV-2. 14 Furthermore, recent observations reported either a reduced mortality rate 25,26 or a neutral effect 27,28 associated with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors prior to or during hospitalization for COVID-19, in patients with T2D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%