2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to biological and chemical agents at biomass power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A limited number of recent studies provide information on dust concentrations measured within facilities associated with biomass processing power stations. The dust concentration values reported in our study were similar to those measured by Rohr et al [ 37 ] during normal operation of two CHP stations, and approximately one order of magnitude lower than those described by Laitinen et al [ 38 ] for stationary site and truck driver’s breathing zones during unloading of wood chips, stumps, peat and solid recovered fuel. Jumpponen et al reported much higher concentrations of dust (reaching 175 ± 106 mg/m 3 ) inside and outside biomass-fired power plant boilers during post-combustion ash removal and other maintenance tasks [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A limited number of recent studies provide information on dust concentrations measured within facilities associated with biomass processing power stations. The dust concentration values reported in our study were similar to those measured by Rohr et al [ 37 ] during normal operation of two CHP stations, and approximately one order of magnitude lower than those described by Laitinen et al [ 38 ] for stationary site and truck driver’s breathing zones during unloading of wood chips, stumps, peat and solid recovered fuel. Jumpponen et al reported much higher concentrations of dust (reaching 175 ± 106 mg/m 3 ) inside and outside biomass-fired power plant boilers during post-combustion ash removal and other maintenance tasks [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mixtures of fuels also seemed to be very susceptible to microbial growth. Actinobacteria, Aspergillus fumigatus, Penicillium sp., and yeasts were the most common identified species in the study from Finland [35]. Microbial concentrations during unloading were higher than 10 4 CFU.m -3 , which may pose a threat to worker health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Increased levels of Interleukin 1β was found among plant workers in their exhaled breath condensate, pointing to a sub-chronic and chronic inflammation of the respiratory tract [ 33 ]. Another exposure study was conducted in three biomass heat and power plants in Finland [ 37 ]. During the processing of biomass, workers were exposed to high levels of actinobacteria, bacterial endotoxins, and fungi, as well as to organic dust and volatile organic compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventive measures to avoid health impacts in biomass power facilities comprise technology controls and measures (e.g., isolation of the fuel reception hall, crushers, and screens; enclosure of conveyors; control rooms for supervision of unloading fuel trucks; automated fuel sampling; automatic cleaning systems for fuel trucks), worker training on the correct handling of biomass and resulting ashes, improvement of the quality of fuels, and protective clothing (e.g., hoods) and respirators [ 12 , 37 ]. Technical solutions should be preferred to protective clothing and respirators [ 37 ]. Some of these measures (especially of the post-combustion phase) are well known from the fossil fuel industry [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%