2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder: An optimizing inhibitory learning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ERP group consisted of 10 two-hour sessions based on treatment recommendations derived from inhibitory learning theory (Abramowitz & Arch, 2014;Arch & Abramowitz, 2015). Session 1 introduced the rationale for ERP.…”
Section: Erp Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERP group consisted of 10 two-hour sessions based on treatment recommendations derived from inhibitory learning theory (Abramowitz & Arch, 2014;Arch & Abramowitz, 2015). Session 1 introduced the rationale for ERP.…”
Section: Erp Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, CBT exposures that emphasize inhibitory learning principles may improve extinction learning and retention and thereby lead to improved clinical outcomes. Several strategies that focus on enhancing inhibitory learning, retention, and retrieval have been suggested to improve extinction during exposures among adults [27,28,89,90], and may be beneficial for youth when implemented in a developmentally appropriate manner. There are a handful of articles that describe the theoretical rationale for inhibitory learning strategies in detail, and clarify more fully how these strategies differ from prior theoretical approaches [27,28].…”
Section: Implications For Treatment Based On Impaired Threat Condimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the child might view a dog from afar and then wait 10 minutes before actually conducting the repeated exposure trials. Two additional strategies that may improve inhibitory learning include affect labeling ( identifying and labeling emotions during exposures) [92], and increased time intervals between sessions (gradually increasing the time and duration between exposure sessions during relapse prevention and booster sessions) [28,89]. …”
Section: Implications For Treatment Based On Impaired Threat Condimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ET seems to be able to disconfirm misattributions by violating expectations without explicitly targeting them with cognitive techniques. Through experiential evidence, ET can thus cause the same cognitive changes as CT, as proposed in the inhibitory learning model (see, for example, Arch and Abramowitz, 2014; Bouton, 1993; Bouton, Woods, Moody, Sunsay and García-Gutiérrez, 2006; Craske et al, 2008; Craske, Treanor, Conway, Zbozinek and Vervliet, 2014; Vervliet, Craske and Hermans, 2013). In this process, non-danger based associations between the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus are formed (“Dizziness is not dangerous and may occur”), and fear tolerance (“Fear is tolerable”) is increased; then, the non-danger based associations compete with original danger based associations (“Dizziness is dangerous and a sign of a brain tumour”).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%