2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure of Chironomus riparius larvae to uranium: Effects on survival, development time, growth, and mouthpart deformities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There were four replicates per treatment (16 experimental units). We chose exposure concentrations equal to 0, 32, 64, and 128 lg g -1 dry weight based on the result of a previous single generation experiment (Dias et al 2008).…”
Section: Multi-generation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were four replicates per treatment (16 experimental units). We chose exposure concentrations equal to 0, 32, 64, and 128 lg g -1 dry weight based on the result of a previous single generation experiment (Dias et al 2008).…”
Section: Multi-generation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uranium chemical toxicity is considered to be more important than radiological toxicity (Sheppard et al 2005). Data concerning uranium effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates are scarce (Dias et al 2008). Our study species, C. riparius, is convenient for assessing the toxicity of contaminated sediments in multi-generation tests, mainly because it has a short life-cycle under laboratory conditions (Vogt et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As C. sancticaroli individuals used in our morphological analysis did not come into contact with chemical pollutants, we cannot draw a connection between the division of the central tooth and chemical exposure. However, since our experimental population was maintained under laboratory conditions for about two years, we cannot rule out the possibility of inbreeding, which has been reported also as a possible cause of high levels of deformities in cultured chironomids (BIRD et al 1995, BIRD 1997, VERMEULEN et al 2000a, DIAS et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were then digested using a combination of HNO 3 and H 2 O 2 , filtered (0.45 lm; cellulose acetate; Minisart Ò ) and diluted to volume with acidified water (2% HNO 3 ) (Dias et al 2008). Uranium concentration was measured by ICP-MS. Gaffiere River water sampled at S0 was also analysed: uranium concentration and major cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K) were analysed by ICP-AES and anions were analysed by ionic chromatography.…”
Section: Chemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bioassay aimed to determine the LC 50 on larvae growth at 7 days. Moreover, in order to determine if effluent toxicity was due to presence of uranium, bioassays were also performed using uranium nitrate, a molecule which has been largely studied in the laboratory on algae (Fortin et al 2004), daphnids (Zeman et al 2008), midge (Dias et al 2008) and zebrafish (Barillet et al 2007; Barillet et al 2005;Bourrachot et al 2008). In order to compare the contamination levels, toxicity results are reported to uranium concentrations in the text (mg U/l) for effluent and uranium nitrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%